Cited by 476Consumer Market Behavior and PricingMarketing and Advertising StrategiesMerger and Competition Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advertising, learning, and consumer choice in experience good markets: An empirical examination

Open access
Ackerberg, Daniel A.·2003·International Economic Review

Abstract

This article empirically analyzes different effects of advertising in a nondurable, experience good market. A dynamic learning model of consumer behavior is presented in which I allow both “informative” effects of advertising and “prestige” or “image” effects of advertising. This learning model is estimated using consumer level panel data tracking grocery purchases and advertising exposures over time. Empirical results suggest that in this market, advertising's primary effect was that of informing consumers. The estimates are used to quantify the value of this information to consumers and evaluate the welfare implications of an alternative advertising regulatory regime.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1468-2354.t01-2-00098

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ackerberg D. “Advertising Information and Consumer Choice in Experience Good Markets ”Ph.D. Dissertation Yale University 1997.
  2. Advertising Age
  3. DeGroot M., 1970, Optimal Statistical Decisions
  4. Eckstein Z., 1991, The Specification and Estimation of Dynamic Stochastic Discrete Choice Models, The Journal of Human Resources, 24, 563
  5. Galbraith J. K., 1958, The Affluent Society
  6. Marshall A., 1919, Industry and Trade: A Study of Industrial Technique and Business Organization
  7. Stigler G., 1977, De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum, American Economic Review, 67, 471

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ackerberg, D. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Ackerberg, Daniel A.
Venue
International Economic Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-07-10
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
1007-1040
ISSN
  • 0020-6598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2354
OpenAlex
W2151084171
Cited by
476
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 36
FWCI
58.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
Keywords
advertising effects, experience goods, consumer learning, informative advertising, consumer choice, advertising regulation, grocery purchases, advertising exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review