The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Annotation: The Development of Antisocial Behavior: An Integrative Causal Model
Abstract
In this paper we have described an integrative causal model of the development of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. The present model primarily integrates several previous models, but offers some new testable hypotheses. We believe that stable individual differences in propensity to antisocial behavior reflect variations in a number of dimensions of predisposing temperament and cognitive ability, each with its own genetic and environmental influences. The dimensions of predisposing temperament include oppositionality, harm avoidance, and callousness. Genetic influences are predicted to have only indirect effects on antisocial behavior via their influence on predisposition and on the youth's social environment. Environmental influences are expected to be important contributors to antisocial propensity, but these environmental influences reflect, in part, the genetic influences on the dimensions of predisposition (i.e. genotype-environment covariance). We also hypothesize that the levels of influence of the factors that determine individual differences in antisocial propensity change with development, such that genetic influences are of greater magnitude in early childhood and social influences contribute more strongly during later childhood and adolescence (both through independent effects and genotype-environment covariance). However, low levels of heritable predisposing child characteristics may protect against peer influences at all ages.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The increased risk taking found in children with ADHD+ODD provides additional evidence that this group is distinct from ADHD-only or ODD-only (Hinshaw et al. 1993; Lahey et al. 1999).”
From Risk taking and sensitivity to punishment in children with ADHD, ODD, ADHD+ODD, and controls (2011) · cites this paper as Lahey et al. 1999
In the citing paper
“Children with ADHD+ODD demonstrated significantly different patterns of risk taking and sensitivity to negative punishment than children with either ADHD-only or ODD-only.”
From Risk taking and sensitivity to punishment in children with ADHD, ODD, ADHD+ODD, and controls (2011) · cites this paper as Lahey et al. 1999
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Oppositional Defiant and Conduct Disorder: A Review of the Past 10 Years, Part I
LOEBER, R., BURKE, J. D., LAHEY, B. B., WINTERS, A., & ZERA, M. (2000) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-200012000-00007 · Cited by 1,192
“Among the general reviews, mention should be made of the work by Hinshaw (1994), Kolko (1994), Lahey et al. (1999a), Loeber (1990), and Tolan and Loeber (1993).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationEarly externalizing behavior problems: Toddlers and preschoolers at risk for later maladjustment
CAMPBELL, S. B., SHAW, D. S., & GILLIOM, M. (2000) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579400003114 · Cited by 1,081
Temperament and developmental psychopathology
Nigg, J. T. (2006) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01612.x · Cited by 971
Hay, D. F., Payne, A. J., & Chadwick, A. (2004) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00308.x · Cited by 701
Aggression in Children and Adolescents with ASD: Prevalence and Risk Factors
Kanne, S. M., & Mazurek, M. O. (2011) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1118-4 · Cited by 533
Metadata
- Authors
- Lahey, B. B., Waldman, I. D., & McBurnett, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Emory University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 669-682
- ISSN
- 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7610
- OpenAlex
- W2167385890
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 19.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Francis Crick Institute
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH53554, R01-MH42529, R01MH042529, R01MH053554, R01MH051091, R01-MH51091)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- antisocial behavior, causal models, temperament, oppositionality, harm avoidance, callousness, cognitive ability, genetic factors, environmental influences, individual differences, peer influence, child development, adolescence, heritability
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Individuality, Infant, Male, Personality Development, Risk Factors, Temperament, Causality, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review