The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An ERP study of change detection, change blindness, and visual awareness
Abstract
Electrophysiological correlates of change detection and change blindness were studied in 12 observers. The ERP difference between detected changes and undetected changes was considered an electrophysiological correlate of visual awareness. Two distinct electrophysiological responses correlated with the awareness of change. First, awareness was associated with a negative amplitude shift at posterior sites around 200 ms after the change in the stimulus. The latency of the negative shift varied as a function of the task difficulty and the speed of becoming aware of the change. Second, ERPs to detected changes became more positive as compared with undetected changes around 400 ms after the change in the stimulus, peaking at parietal sites. We suggest that the earlier negativity is associated with a change in the content of visual awareness, whereas the later positivity may reflect more global processes needed in decision making and action planning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“EEG signals—and thereby the brain's EM field—also correlate with perception in change blindness (Koivisto and Revonsuo, 2003), perceptual masking (Schubert et al., 2009), sound-induced flash illusions (Kaiser et al., 2019) and classic perceptual switching such as when viewing the Rubin's vase/face illusion (Müller et al., 2000).”
From Consciousness: Matter or EMF? (2023) · cites this paper as Koivisto and Revonsuo, 2003
Citations
Cites
(1988) · Cited by 3,656
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585
On a confusion about a function of consciousness
Block, N. (1995) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00038188 · Cited by 3,364
Risto, N. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429487354 · Cited by 2,035
Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3707.001.0001 · Cited by 1,636
Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention
Hillyard, S. A., & Anllo-Vento, L. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.3.781 · Cited by 1,525
Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(97)01080-2 · Cited by 1,039
Consciousness and neuroscience
Crick, F. (1998) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/8.2.97 · Cited by 783
Current Approaches to Change Blindness
Simons, D. J. (2000) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/135062800394658 · Cited by 522
Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness
Beck, D. M., Rees, G. E., Frith, C., & Lavie, N. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/88477 · Cited by 421
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review
Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2008) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x · Cited by 2,567
Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception
Verleger, R., Jaśkowski, P., & Wascher, E. (2005) · Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1027/0269-8803.19.3.165 · Cited by 569
Naghavi, H. R., & Nyberg, L. H. (2004) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2004.10.003 · Cited by 419
Event-related brain potential correlates of visual awareness
Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A. (2010) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.002 · Cited by 314
Self-citationPitts, M. A., Metzler, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01078 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Turku (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Koivisto, Mika
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-04-29
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 423-429
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- OpenAlex
- W2044324048
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- change detection, change blindness, visual awareness, event-related potentials, visual attention, task difficulty, decision-making, action planning
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
