Cited by 59

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maternal tobacco use and extremely premature birth – a population‐based cohort study

Dahlin, S, Gunnerbeck, A, Wikström, A‐K, Cnattingius, S, Edstedt Bonamy, A‐K·2016·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective: To study the associations of maternal tobacco use (smoking or use of snuff) and risk of extremely preterm birth, and if tobacco cessation before antenatal booking influences this risk. To study the association between tobacco use and spontaneous or medically indicated onset of delivery. Design: Population‐based cohort study. Setting: Sweden. Population: All live singleton births, registered in the Swedish Medical Birth Register, 1999–2012. Methods: Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using multiple logistic regression analysis. Main outcome measures: Extremely preterm birth (<28 weeks of gestation), very preterm birth (28–31 weeks), moderately preterm birth (32–36 weeks). Results: Maternal snuff use (OR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.14–2.21) and smoking (OR 1.61; 95% CI: 1.39–1.87 and OR 1.91; 95% CI: 1.53–2.39 for moderate and heavy smoking, respectively) were associated with an increased risk of extremely preterm birth. When cessation of tobacco use was obtained there was no increased risk of preterm birth. Snuff use was associated with a twofold risk increase of medically indicated extremely preterm birth, whereas smoking was associated with increased risks of both medically indicated and spontaneous extremely preterm birth. Conclusions: Snuff use and smoking in pregnancy were associated with increased risks of extremely preterm birth. Women who stopped using tobacco before the antenatal booking had no increased risk. These findings indicate that nicotine, the common substance in cigarettes and snuff, is involved in the mechanisms behind preterm birth. The use of nicotine should be minimized in pregnancy. Tweetable abstract: Tobacco use increases risk of extremely preterm birth. Cessation is preventive. Avoid nicotine in pregnancy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-0528.14213

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1186/1742-4755-10-S1-S2 · DOI
  3. 10.1186/1742-4755-10-S1-S1 · DOI
  4. National Board of Health and Welfare, 2015, Pregnancies, Deliveries and Newborn Infants: The Swedish Medical Birth Register 1973‐2014
  5. 10.1001/jama.2013.6295 · DOI
  6. Curtin SC, 2016, Smoking prevalence and cessation before and during pregnancy: data from the birth certificate, 2014, Natl Vital Stat Rep, 65, 1
  7. 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70214-5 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00848.x · DOI
  9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008363 · DOI
  10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0060660 · DOI
  11. 10.1136/tc.12.4.349 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60677-1 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/13547500902965401 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34281-5 · DOI
  15. 10.1097/NMC.0b013e3181cafba4 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s10654-012-9676-8 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02575.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00661-6 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Center of Epidemiology the National Board Of Health and Welfare, 2003, The Swedish Medical Birth Register‐A Summary of Content and Quality
  20. Statens beredning för utvärdering av medicinsk metodik (SBU), 1998, Rutinmässig Ultraljudsundersökning Under Graviditet
  21. 10.1007/s10654-016-0117-y · DOI
  22. Rothman KJ, 2002, Epidemiology: An Introduction, 53
  23. Mattsson K, 2016, Cotinine validation of self‐reported smoking during pregnancy in the swedish medical birth register, Nicotine Tob Res, 18, 79
  24. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.147082 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/ntr/ntt117 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90499-9 · DOI
  27. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000188408.49896.c5 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1001/jama.292.18.2249 · DOI
  29. 10.2741/2248 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70341-8 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0146-0005(96)80079-6 · DOI
  32. 10.1055/s-2006-956773 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02284-1 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1038/nri803 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 59

Metadata

Authors
Dahlin, S., Gunnerbeck, A., Wikström, A., Cnattingius, S., & Edstedt Bonamy, A.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-14
Volume
123
Issue
12
Pages
1938-1946
ISSN
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
Cited by
59
References
10
Language
en
Funders
Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (2009‐1619, 2010‐0643)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review