Cited by 55Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceMedical Coding and Health InformationStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Imputing missing race/ethnicity in pediatric electronic health records: reducing bias with use of U.S. Census location and surname data

Open access
Grundmeier, Robert W., Song, Lihai, Ramos, Mark J., Fiks, Alexander G., Elliott, Marc N., Fremont, Allen, Pace, Wilson, Wasserman, Richard C. +1 more·2015·Health Services Research

Abstract

Objective: To assess the utility of imputing race/ethnicity using U.S. Census race/ethnicity, residential address, and surname information compared to standard missing data methods in a pediatric cohort. Data Sources/Study Setting: Electronic health record data from 30 pediatric practices with known race/ethnicity. Study Design: In a simulation experiment, we constructed dichotomous and continuous outcomes with pre‐specified associations with known race/ethnicity. Bias was introduced by nonrandomly setting race/ethnicity to missing. We compared typical methods for handling missing race/ethnicity (multiple imputation alone with clinical factors, complete case analysis, indicator variables) to multiple imputation incorporating surname and address information. Principal Findings: Imputation using U.S. Census information reduced bias for both continuous and dichotomous outcomes. Conclusions: The new method reduces bias when race/ethnicity is partially, nonrandomly missing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1475-6773.12295

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most widely researched imputation method was Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding (BISG).

    “The most widely researched imputation method was Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding (BISG).22,45,46,50,65”

    From The quality of social determinants data in the electronic health record: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [65]

    The paper’s BISG Method and Discussion sections show that it studies BISG as a race/ethnicity imputation method, and its introduction cites several earlier BISG studies. It does not compare how extensively BISG and other imputation methods have been researched, so it does not establish that BISG was the most widely researched. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Three studies in the review found that casewise deletion decreased the quality of race/ethnicity data.

    “However, 3 studies in our review found that casewise deletion decreased the quality of race/ethnicity data.23,50,65”

    From The quality of social determinants data in the electronic health record: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Performance of Imputation Methods section reports that complete-case analysis, which excludes records with missing values, produced highly biased estimates of associations between race/ethnicity and outcomes. This supports the concern about casewise deletion, but the paper measures bias in analysis results rather than a decrease in the quality of the race/ethnicity data itself. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several studies looked at the use of imputation to increase the completeness of datasets and avoid casewise deletion.

    “Several studies looked at the use of imputation, also referred to as indirect estimation, to increase the completeness of datasets and avoid casewise deletion.14,22,30,45,46,50,61,65,67–70”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Bergdall, A., S. Asche, N. Schneider, T. Kerby, K. Margolis, J. Sperl-Hillen, J. Sekenski, R. Pritchard, M. Maciosek, and P. O ' Connor. 2012. ' CB3-01: Comparison of Ethnicity and Race Categorization in Electronic Medical Records and by SelfReport. ' Clinical Medicine & Research 10 (3): 172. doi:10.3121/cmr.2012.1100.cb301. · DOI
  2. Bierman, A. S., N. Lurie, K. S. Collins, and J. M. Eisenberg. 2002. ' Addressing Racial and Ethnic Barriers to Effective Health Care: The Need for Better Data. ' Health Affairs (Project Hope) 21 (3): 91 -102.
  3. Bilheimer, L. T., and J. E. Sisk. 2008. ' Collecting Adequate Data on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health: The Challenges Continue. ' Health Affairs (Project Hope) 27 (2): 383 -91. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.27 .2.383. · DOI
  4. Elliott, M. N., A. Fremont, P. A. Morrison, P. Pantoja, and N. Lurie. 2008. ' A New Method for Estimating Race/Ethnicity and Associated Disparities Where Administrative Records Lack Self-Reported Race/Ethnicity. ' Health Services Research 43 (5 Pt 1): 1 722 -36. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00854.x. · DOI
  5. Elliott, M. N., K. Becker, M. K. Beckett, K. Hambarsoomian, P. Pantoja, and B. Karney. 2013. ' Using Indirect Estimates Based on Name and Census Tract to Improve the Ef fi ciency of Sampling Matched Ethnic Couples from Marriage License Data. ' Public Opinion Quarterly 77 (1): 375 -84. doi:10.1093/poq/nft007. · DOI
  6. Fiks, A. G., R. W. Grundmeier, B. Margolis, L. M. Bell, J. Steffes, J. Massey, and R. C. Wasserman. 2012. ' Comparative Effectiveness Research Using the Electronic Medical Record: An Emerging Area of Investigation in Pediatric Primary Care. ' Journal of Pediatrics 160 (5): 719 -24. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.01.039. · DOI
  7. Fiscella, K., and A. M. Fremont. 2006. ' Use of Geocoding and Surname Analysis to Estimate Race and Ethnicity. ' Health Services Research 41 (4 Pt 1): 1482 -500. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00551.x. · DOI
  8. Fremont, A. M., A. Bierman, S. L. Wickstrom, C. E. Bird, M. Shah, J. J. Escarce, T. Horstman, and T. Rector. 2005. ' Use of Geocoding in Managed Care Settings to Identify Quality Disparities. ' Health Affairs (Project Hope) 24 (2): 516 -26. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.516. · DOI
  9. Graham, J. W. 2012. Missing Data Analysis and Design . New York: Springer.
  10. Knol, M. J., K. J. M. Janssen, A. R. T. Donders, A. C. G. Egberts, E. R. Heerdink, D. E. Grobbee, K. G. M. Moons, and M. I. Geerlings. 2010. ' Unpredictable Bias WhenUsing the Missing Indicator Method or Complete Case Analysis for Missing Confounder Values: An Empirical Example. ' Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63 (7): 728 -36. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.028. · DOI
  11. Little, R. J. A. 1992. ' Regression with Missing X ' s: A Review. ' Journal of the American Statistical Association 87 (420): 1227 -37.
  12. Martino, S. C., R. M. Weinick, D. E. Kanouse, J. A. Brown, A. M. Haviland, E. Goldstein, J. L. Adams, K. Hambarsoomian, D. J. Klein, and M. N. Elliott. 2013. ' Reporting CAHPS and HEDIS Data by Race/Ethnicity for Medicare Benefi ciaries. ' Health Services Research 48 (2 Pt 1): 417 -34. doi:10.1111/j.14756773.2012.01452.x. · DOI
  13. McCaffrey, D. F., and M. N. Elliott. 2008. ' Power of Tests for a Dichotomous Independent Variable Measured with Error. ' Health Services Research 43 (3): 1085 -101. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00810.x. · DOI
  14. Molenberghs, G., and M. G. Kenward. 2007. Missing Data in Clinical Studies, Chichester . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  15. National Research Council (U.S.), Panel on Handling Missing Data in Clinical Trials, National Research Council (U.S.), and Committee on National Statistics. 2010. The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials . Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  16. Olsen, L., D. Aisner, J. M. McGinnis, and Institute of Medicine (U.S.), and Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine. 2007. The Learning Healthcare System Workshop Summary . Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  17. Rubin, D. B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys . New York: Wiley.
  18. White, I. R., P. Royston, and A. M. Wood. 2011. ' Multiple Imputation Using Chained Equations: Issues and Guidance for Practice. ' Statistics in Medicine 30 (4): 377 -99. doi:10.1002/sim.4067. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Wolraich, M. L., I. D. Feurer, J. N. Hannah, A. Baumgaertel, and T. Y. Pinnock. 1998. ' Obtaining Systematic Teacher Reports of Disruptive Behavior Disorders Utilizing DSM-IV. ' Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 26 (2): 141 -52.
  20. Wynia, M. K., S. L. Ivey, and R. Hasnain-Wynia. 2010. ' Collection of Data on Patients ' Race and Ethnic Group by Physician Practices. ' New England Journal of Medicine 362 (9): 846 -50. doi:10.1056/NEJMsb0910799. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grundmeier, R. W., Song, L., Ramos, M. J., Fiks, A. G., Elliott, M. N., Fremont, A., Pace, W., Wasserman, R. C., & Localio, R.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • DARTNet Institute (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Grundmeier, Robert W.
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-11
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
946-960
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W1985419223
Cited by
55
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (P30HS021645)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (UB5MC20286)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
imputation bias, residential addresses, U.S. Census, multiple imputation, complete case analysis, dummy variables, racial and ethnic disparities, simulation study
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Asthma, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Black or African American, Child, Child, Preschool, Data Collection, Ethnicity, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Names, Research Design, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Bias, Censuses, Racial Groups, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review