Cited by 118Nursing Roles and PracticesHealthcare Policy and ManagementPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Comparing the Cost of Care Provided to Medicare Beneficiaries Assigned to Primary Care Nurse Practitioners and Physicians

Open access
Perloff, Jennifer, DesRoches, Catherine M., Buerhaus, Peter·2016·Health Services Research

Abstract

Objective: This study is designed to assess the cost of services provided to Medicare beneficiaries by nurse practitioners ( NP s) billing under their own National Provider Identification number as compared to primary care physicians ( PCMDs ). Data Source: Medicare Part A (inpatient) and Part B (office visit) claims for 2009–2010. Study Design: Retrospective cohort design using propensity score weighted regression. Data Extraction Methods: Beneficiaries cared for by a random sample of NP s and primary care physicians. Principal Findings: After adjusting for demographic characteristics, geography, comorbidities, and the propensity to see an NP , Medicare evaluation and management payments for beneficiaries assigned to an NP were $207, or 29 percent, less than PCMD assigned beneficiaries. The same pattern was observed for inpatient and total office visit paid amounts, with 11 and 18 percent less for NP assigned beneficiaries, respectively. Results are similar for the work component of relative value units as well. Conclusions: This study provides new evidence of the lower cost of care for beneficiaries managed by NP s, as compared to those managed by PCMD s across inpatient and office‐based settings. Results suggest that increasing access to NP primary care will not increase costs for the Medicare program and may be cost saving.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1475-6773.12425

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature generally reports similar or marginally lower costs for nurse-led services.

    “This literature generally reports similar27,34-37 or marginally lower29,38-41 costs for nurse-led services.”

    From Evaluating the cost of NP-led vs. GP-led primary care in British Columbia (2024) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Abstract (page not provided) reports lower Medicare payments for beneficiaries assigned to nurse practitioners: 29% less for evaluation and management, 11% less for inpatient care, and 18% less for office visits. This supports the cited claim of lower costs, but “marginally” understates at least the 29% difference. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Institute of Medicine. 2010. The Future of Nursing. Washington, DC: The National Aca- demies Press [accessed on August 15, 2015]. Available at http://www.thefuture- ofnursing.org/IOM-Report

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perloff, J., DesRoches, C. M., & Buerhaus, P.
Affiliations
  • Brandeis University (US)
  • Mathematica Policy Research (US)
  • Montana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Perloff, Jennifer
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-27
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
1407-1423
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2209421517
Cited by
118
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
18.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Montana State University ScholarWorks (Montana State University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
nurse practitioners, primary care physicians, Medicare, cost of care, relative value units, hospital costs, office visits, primary care access, cost reduction
MeSH terms
Medicare, Humans, Nurse Practitioners, Primary Health Care, Reimbursement Mechanisms, Retrospective Studies, United States, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review