Cited by 278Nursing Roles and PracticesPrimary Care and Health OutcomesHealthcare Systems and Technology

Primary Care Outcomes in Patients treated by Nurse Practitioners or Physicians: Two-Year Follow-Up

Lenz, Elizabeth R., Mundinger, Mary O’Neil, Kane, Robert L., Hopkins, Sarah C., Lin, Susan X.·2004·Medical Care Research and Review

Abstract

This study reports results of the 2-year follow-up phase of a randomized study comparing outcomes of patients assigned to a nurse practitioner or a physician primary care practice. In the sample of 406 adults, no differences were found between the groups in health status, disease-specific physiologic measures, satisfaction or use of specialist, emergency room or inpatient services. Physician patients averaged more primary care visits than nurse practitioner patients. The results are consistent with the 6-month findings and with a growing body of evidence that the quality of primary care delivered by nurse practitioners is equivalent to that by physicians.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077558704266821

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Measurable clinical outcomes are systematically found to be equivalent to those produced by medical models, though patient satisfaction tends to be higher for nurse-provided services.

    “Measurable clinical outcomes are systematically found to be equivalent11,18,19,23,27-32 to those produced by medical models, though patient satisfaction tends to be higher for nurse-provided services.11,19,21,26,27,29,30,33,34”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lenz, E. R., Mundinger, M. O., Kane, R. L., Hopkins, S. C., & Lin, S. X.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Medical Care Research and Review
Published
2004-09
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
332-351
ISSN
  • 1077-5587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6801
OpenAlex
W2162317664
Cited by
278
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 22
FWCI
12.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care Research and Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
nurse practitioners, primary care quality, health status, emergency department utilization, patient satisfaction, primary care visits, health outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Services Research, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New York City, Nurse Practitioners, Physicians, Primary Health Care, Quality of Health Care, Chi-Square Distribution, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review