Cited by 114Nursing Roles and PracticesHealthcare Policy and ManagementPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Use of Midlevel Practitioners to Achieve Labor Cost Savings in the Primary Care Practice of an MCO

Open access
Roblin, Douglas W., Howard, David H., Becker, Edmund R., Kathleen Adams, E., Roberts, Melissa H.·2004·Health Services Research

Abstract

Objective. To estimate the savings in labor costs per primary care visit that might be realized from increased use of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) in the primary care practices of a managed care organization (MCO). Study Setting/Data Sources. Twenty‐six capitated primary care practices of a group model MCO. Data on approximately two million visits provided by 206 practitioners were extracted from computerized visit records for 1997–2000. Computerized payroll ledgers were the source of annual labor costs per practice from 1997–2000. Study Design. Likelihood of a visit attended by a PA/NP versus MD was modeled using logistic regression, with practice fixed effects, by department (adult medicine, pediatrics) and year. Parameter estimates and practice fixed effects from these regressions were used to predict the proportion of PA/NP visits per practice per year given a standard case mix. Least squares regressions, with practice fixed effects, were used to estimate the association of this standardized predicted proportion of PA/NP visits with average annual practitioner and total labor costs per visit, controlling for other practice characteristics. Results. On average, PAs/NPs attended one in three adult medicine visits and one in five pediatric medicine visits. Likelihood of a PA/NP visit was significantly higher than average among patients presenting with minor acute illness (e.g., acute pharyngitis). In adult medicine, likelihood of a PA/NP visit was lower than average among older patients. Practitioner labor costs per visit and total labor costs per visit were lower (p<.01 and p=.08, respectively) among practices with greater use of PAs/NPs, standardized for case mix. Conclusions. Primary care practices that used more PAs/NPs in care delivery realized lower practitioner labor costs per visit than practices that used less. Future research should investigate the cost savings and cost‐effectiveness potential of delivery designs that change staffing mix and division of labor among clinical disciplines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00247.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roblin, D. W., Howard, D. H., Becker, E. R., Kathleen Adams, E., & Roberts, M. H.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente (US)
Corresponding author
Roblin, Douglas W.
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-05-04
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
607-626
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W1997458217
Cited by
114
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R01 CD000033)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01 HS026232)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
physician assistants, nurse practitioners, labor cost reduction, primary care, managed care organizations, cost per visit, division of labor, elderly patients
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Cost Control, Diagnosis-Related Groups, Georgia, Humans, Managed Care Programs, Middle Aged, Nurse Practitioners, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Physician Assistants, Primary Health Care, Likelihood Functions, Linear Models, Health Care Costs, Models, Organizational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review