Cited by 161Machine Learning in HealthcareMedical Coding and Health InformationHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Hospital Readmission and Social Risk Factors Identified from Physician Notes

Open access
Navathe, Amol S., Zhong, Feiran, Lei, Victor J., Chang, Frank Y., Sordo, Margarita, Topaz, Maxim, Navathe, Shamkant B., Rocha, Roberto A. +1 more·2018·Health Services Research

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the prevalence of seven social factors using physician notes as compared to claims and structured electronic health records (EHRs) data and the resulting association with 30-day readmissions. Study setting A multihospital academic health system in southeastern Massachusetts. Study design An observational study of 49,319 patients with cardiovascular disease admitted from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013, using multivariable logistic regression to adjust for patient characteristics. Data collection/extraction methods All-payer claims, EHR data, and physician notes extracted from a centralized clinical registry. Principal findings All seven social characteristics were identified at the highest rates in physician notes. For example, we identified 14,872 patient admissions with poor social support in physician notes, increasing the prevalence from 0.4 percent using ICD-9 codes and structured EHR data to 16.0 percent. Compared to an 18.6 percent baseline readmission rate, risk-adjusted analysis showed higher readmission risk for patients with housing instability (readmission rate 24.5 percent; p Conclusions The seven social risk factors studied are substantially more prevalent than represented in administrative data. Automated methods for analyzing physician notes may enable better identification of patients with social needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1475-6773.12670

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When predictive algorithms are being developed from clinical data, nurses can contribute with practice-based perspectives to technical teams to understand why some data elements are missing or incomplete.

    “For example, when predictive algorithms are being developed from clinical data, nurses can contribute with practice‐based perspectives to technical teams (often consisting of engineers, computer scientists, user interface design experts, etc.) to understand why some data elements are missing or incomplete (e.g. poor documentation of social risk factors) (Navathe et al., 2018) and offer potential”
  • SDoH which are less commonly targeted for extraction have been shown to impact healthcare.

    “In addition to our technical innovations, our work adds to prior efforts by investigating SDoH which are less commonly targeted for extraction but nonetheless have been shown to impact healthcare43–51.”
  • Prior work investigating social risk factor documentation using ICD-10 codes has suggested that these codes are underutilized, and one study found that ICD codes were used less frequently to document social risk factors when compared to note narratives (unstructured data).

    “Prior work investigating social risk factor documentation using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) codes, specifically, has suggested that these codes are underutilized, 3,4 and 1 study found that ICD codes were used less frequently to document social risk factors when compared to note narratives (unstructured data).5”
  • Clinicians may not be aware of structured SDH documentation tools, and prior work has shown that free-text notes were more commonly used for SDH documentation.

    “Alternatively, clinicians may not be aware of structured SDH documentation tools, 18 and prior work has shown that free-text notes were more commonly used for SDH documentation. 5”
  • Prior studies reveal the value of measuring different approaches to SDOH documentation in the EHR but do not offer a generalizable set of measures that can be used to compare different EHR-based SDOH documentation options.

    “These studies reveal the value of measuring different approaches to SDOH documentation in the EHR but do not offer a generalizable set of measures that can be used to compare different EHR-based SDOH documentation options.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Navathe, A. S., Zhong, F., Lei, V. J., Chang, F. Y., Sordo, M., Topaz, M., Navathe, S. B., Rocha, R. A., & Zhou, L.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Clinical Informatics Partners eCare Partners Healthcare Inc. Boston MA
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Navathe, Amol S.
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-13
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
1110-1136
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2596821164
Cited by
161
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Funders
Partners Siemens Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
hospital readmission, social risk factors, physician notes, social determinants of health, cardiovascular disease, housing instability, depression, drug abuse, social support, natural language processing, electronic health records
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depression, Documentation, Female, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Insurance Claim Review, Male, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Natural Language Processing, Patient Readmission, Physicians, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Logistic Models, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review