Hospital Readmission and Social Risk Factors Identified from Physician Notes
Open accessAbstract
Objective To evaluate the prevalence of seven social factors using physician notes as compared to claims and structured electronic health records (EHRs) data and the resulting association with 30-day readmissions. Study setting A multihospital academic health system in southeastern Massachusetts. Study design An observational study of 49,319 patients with cardiovascular disease admitted from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013, using multivariable logistic regression to adjust for patient characteristics. Data collection/extraction methods All-payer claims, EHR data, and physician notes extracted from a centralized clinical registry. Principal findings All seven social characteristics were identified at the highest rates in physician notes. For example, we identified 14,872 patient admissions with poor social support in physician notes, increasing the prevalence from 0.4 percent using ICD-9 codes and structured EHR data to 16.0 percent. Compared to an 18.6 percent baseline readmission rate, risk-adjusted analysis showed higher readmission risk for patients with housing instability (readmission rate 24.5 percent; p Conclusions The seven social risk factors studied are substantially more prevalent than represented in administrative data. Automated methods for analyzing physician notes may enable better identification of patients with social needs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When predictive algorithms are being developed from clinical data, nurses can contribute with practice-based perspectives to technical teams to understand why some data elements are missing or incomplete.
“For example, when predictive algorithms are being developed from clinical data, nurses can contribute with practice‐based perspectives to technical teams (often consisting of engineers, computer scientists, user interface design experts, etc.) to understand why some data elements are missing or incomplete (e.g. poor documentation of social risk factors) (Navathe et al., 2018) and offer potential”
From Artificial intelligence in nursing: Priorities and opportunities from an international invitational think‐tank of the Nursing and Artificial Intelligence Leadership Collaborative (2021) · cites this paper as Navathe et al., 2018
SDoH which are less commonly targeted for extraction have been shown to impact healthcare.
“In addition to our technical innovations, our work adds to prior efforts by investigating SDoH which are less commonly targeted for extraction but nonetheless have been shown to impact healthcare43–51.”
From Large language models to identify social determinants of health in electronic health records (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
Prior work investigating social risk factor documentation using ICD-10 codes has suggested that these codes are underutilized, and one study found that ICD codes were used less frequently to document social risk factors when compared to note narratives (unstructured data).
“Prior work investigating social risk factor documentation using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) codes, specifically, has suggested that these codes are underutilized, 3,4 and 1 study found that ICD codes were used less frequently to document social risk factors when compared to note narratives (unstructured data).5”
From Structured and unstructured social risk factor documentation in the electronic health record underestimates patients’ self-reported risks (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
Clinicians may not be aware of structured SDH documentation tools, and prior work has shown that free-text notes were more commonly used for SDH documentation.
“Alternatively, clinicians may not be aware of structured SDH documentation tools, 18 and prior work has shown that free-text notes were more commonly used for SDH documentation. 5”
From Structured and unstructured social risk factor documentation in the electronic health record underestimates patients’ self-reported risks (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
Prior studies reveal the value of measuring different approaches to SDOH documentation in the EHR but do not offer a generalizable set of measures that can be used to compare different EHR-based SDOH documentation options.
“These studies reveal the value of measuring different approaches to SDOH documentation in the EHR but do not offer a generalizable set of measures that can be used to compare different EHR-based SDOH documentation options.”
From Documentation and review of social determinants of health data in the EHR: measures and associated insights (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
A small set of studies has measured the extent to which specific social risk factors are documented in EHRs in different types of fields.
“A small set of studies has measured the extent to which specific social risk factors are documented in EHRs in different types of fields.11,12”
From Documentation and review of social determinants of health data in the EHR: measures and associated insights (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Prior studies do not include measures that reflect whether SDOH data are reviewed after being documented.
“They also do not include measures that reflect whether SDOH data are reviewed after being documented.”
From Documentation and review of social determinants of health data in the EHR: measures and associated insights (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Adding Z-codes to the EHR's problem list did not result in high levels of SDOH data documentation even many years after these codes were released.
“We (and others11,12) have found that another structured approach—adding Z-codes to the EHR's problem list—also did not result in high levels of SDOH data documentation even many years after these codes were released.”
From Documentation and review of social determinants of health data in the EHR: measures and associated insights (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Cites
Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.
Elixhauser, A., Steiner, C., Harris, D. R., & Coffey, R. M. (1998) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004 · Cited by 9,921 · see citing works
Social determinants of health inequalities
Marmot, M. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71146-6 · Cited by 5,086 · see citing works
Nordestgaard, B. G., Benn, M., Schnohr, P., & Tybjærg-Hansen, A. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.3.299 · Cited by 2,058 · see citing works
Fried, L. P. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.279.8.585 · Cited by 1,107 · see citing works
Kuper, H., Marmot, M., & Hemingway, H. (2002) · Seminars in Vascular Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-2002-35401 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ronquillo, C. E., Peltonen, L., Pruinelli, L., Chu, C. H., Bakken, S., Beduschi, A., Cato, K., Hardiker, N., Junger, A., Michalowski, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14855 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Self-citationLarge language models to identify social determinants of health in electronic health records
Guevara, M., Chen, S., Thomas, S., Chaunzwa, T. L., Franco, I., Kann, B. H., Moningi, S., Qian, J. M., Goldstein, M., Harper, S., et al. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00970-0 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Patra, B. G., Sharma, M. M., Vekaria, V., Adekkanattu, P., Patterson, O. V., Glicksberg, B., Lepow, L. A., Ryu, E., Biernacka, J. M., Furmanchuk, A., et al. (2021) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocab170 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Wang, M., Pantell, M. S., Gottlieb, L. M., & Adler-Milstein, J. (2021) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocab194 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Iott, B. E., Rivas, S., Gottlieb, L. M., Adler-Milstein, J., & Pantell, M. S. (2024) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocad261 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Navathe, A. S., Zhong, F., Lei, V. J., Chang, F. Y., Sordo, M., Topaz, M., Navathe, S. B., Rocha, R. A., & Zhou, L.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Clinical Informatics Partners eCare Partners Healthcare Inc. Boston MA
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Navathe, Amol S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Health Services Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-03-13
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1110-1136
- ISSN
- 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6773
- PMC
- PMC5867172
- OpenAlex
- W2596821164
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 8.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Funders
- Partners Siemens Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Keywords
- hospital readmission, social risk factors, physician notes, social determinants of health, cardiovascular disease, housing instability, depression, drug abuse, social support, natural language processing, electronic health records
- MeSH terms
- Accidental Falls, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depression, Documentation, Female, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Insurance Claim Review, Male, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Natural Language Processing, Patient Readmission, Physicians, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Logistic Models, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review