Success Factors for Integrating Suppliers into New Product Development
Abstract
Faster, better, cheaper—these marching orders summarize the challenge facing new product development (NPD). In other words, NPD teams must find the means for speeding time to market while also improving product quality and reducing product costs. Cross‐functional teams have proved effective for meeting these challenges, and such teams may extend beyond company boundaries to include key materials suppliers. Effective integration of suppliers into NPD can yield such benefits as reduced cost and improved quality of purchased materials, reduced product development time, and improved access to and application of technology. As Gary Ragatz, Robert Handfield, and Thomas Scannell point out, however, those benefits do not automatically accrue to any NPD team that includes representatives from a supplier's company. In a study of 60 member companies from the Michigan State University Global Procurement and Supply Chain Electronic Benchmarking Network, they explore the management practices and the environmental factors that relate most closely to successful integration of suppliers into the NPD process. The study identifies supplier membership on the NPD project team as the greatest differentiator between most and least successful integration efforts. Although the respondents reported only moderate use of shared education and training, the study cites this management factor as another significant differentiator between most and least successful efforts. Respondents listed direct, cross‐f…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Businesses most often turn to customers when seeking network relationships on issues associated with innovation.
“Although much of the evidence points toward the important role of suppliers, co-suppliers and distributors in the innovation process it is to customers that businesses most often turn when seeking network relationships on issues associated with innovation (Ragatz et al. 1997).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Ragatz et al. 1997
Customers are considered to be the most important partners during incremental innovation.
“Ragatz et al's (1997) work has also shown that customers are considered to be the most important partners during incremental innovation.”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Ragatz et al's (1997)
Open and direct communication between companies is the critical success factor during supplier interactions in new product development processes.
“The degree of involvement of suppliers tends to depend on the nature of projects; however, open and direct communication between companies has been identified as the critical success factor during supplier interactions in new product development processes (Harryson, 1997;Ragatz et al. 1997;Lincoln et al. 1998;Perez and Sanchez, 2002).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Ragatz et al. 1997
Customer involvement reduces the risks of innovation.
“Customer involvement reduces the risks of innovation (Gemünden et al. 1992;Ragatz et al. 1997).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Ragatz et al. 1997
Effective integration of suppliers provides clearer focus on projects that require joint development.
“Provide clearer focus on the projects that require joint development (Ragatz et al. 1997).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Ragatz et al. 1997
Including suppliers in new product development innovation is valuable.
“The value of including suppliers in new product development innovation has been widely documented in the supply chain literature (Ragatz et al., 1997).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Ragatz et al., 1997
Effective integration of suppliers helps reduce concept-to-customer cycle time, costs and quality problems.
“Help reduce concept-to-customer cycle time, costs and reduce quality problems (Ragatz et al. 1997).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Ragatz et al. 1997
Cites
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346 · see citing works
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2578601 · Cited by 4,163 · see citing works
Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393701 · Cited by 2,426 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x · Cited by 1,747 · see citing works
KANNAN, V (2005) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.012 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
Customization and real time information access in integrated eBusiness supply chain relationships
Klein, R. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.03.001 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Kumar, V., Jabarzadeh, Y., Jeihouni, P., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2020) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-05-2019-0209 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ragatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., & Scannell, T. V.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ragatz, Gary L.
- ORCID
- Handfield, Robert B.
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 190-202
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5885
- OpenAlex
- W1980744525
- Cited by
- 877
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 51
- FWCI
- 21.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Product Innovation Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Product Development and Customization
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Keywords
- supplier integration, new product development, cross-functional teams, inter-organizational collaboration, not-invented-here syndrome, trust building, asset sharing, time to market, product quality, product cost reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review