Cited by 877Quality and Supply ManagementProduct Development and CustomizationBusiness Strategy and Innovation

Success Factors for Integrating Suppliers into New Product Development

Ragatz, Gary L., Handfield, Robert B., Scannell, Thomas V.·1997·Journal of Product Innovation Management

Abstract

Faster, better, cheaper—these marching orders summarize the challenge facing new product development (NPD). In other words, NPD teams must find the means for speeding time to market while also improving product quality and reducing product costs. Cross‐functional teams have proved effective for meeting these challenges, and such teams may extend beyond company boundaries to include key materials suppliers. Effective integration of suppliers into NPD can yield such benefits as reduced cost and improved quality of purchased materials, reduced product development time, and improved access to and application of technology. As Gary Ragatz, Robert Handfield, and Thomas Scannell point out, however, those benefits do not automatically accrue to any NPD team that includes representatives from a supplier's company. In a study of 60 member companies from the Michigan State University Global Procurement and Supply Chain Electronic Benchmarking Network, they explore the management practices and the environmental factors that relate most closely to successful integration of suppliers into the NPD process. The study identifies supplier membership on the NPD project team as the greatest differentiator between most and least successful integration efforts. Although the respondents reported only moderate use of shared education and training, the study cites this management factor as another significant differentiator between most and least successful efforts. Respondents listed direct, cross‐f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1540-5885.1430190

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Businesses most often turn to customers when seeking network relationships on issues associated with innovation.

    “Although much of the evidence points toward the important role of suppliers, co-suppliers and distributors in the innovation process it is to customers that businesses most often turn when seeking network relationships on issues associated with innovation (Ragatz et al. 1997).”

    From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Ragatz et al. 1997

  • Customers are considered to be the most important partners during incremental innovation.

    “Ragatz et al's (1997) work has also shown that customers are considered to be the most important partners during incremental innovation.”

    From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Ragatz et al's (1997)

  • Open and direct communication between companies is the critical success factor during supplier interactions in new product development processes.

    “The degree of involvement of suppliers tends to depend on the nature of projects; however, open and direct communication between companies has been identified as the critical success factor during supplier interactions in new product development processes (Harryson, 1997;Ragatz et al. 1997;Lincoln et al. 1998;Perez and Sanchez, 2002).”

    From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Ragatz et al. 1997

  • Customer involvement reduces the risks of innovation.

    “Customer involvement reduces the risks of innovation (Gemünden et al. 1992;Ragatz et al. 1997).”

    From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Ragatz et al. 1997

  • Effective integration of suppliers provides clearer focus on projects that require joint development.

    “Provide clearer focus on the projects that require joint development (Ragatz et al. 1997).”

    From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Ragatz et al. 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ragatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., & Scannell, T. V.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Ragatz, Gary L.
Venue
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-05
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
190-202
ISSN
  • 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5885
OpenAlex
W1980744525
Cited by
877
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 51
FWCI
21.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Product Innovation Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Product Development and Customization
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
Keywords
supplier integration, new product development, cross-functional teams, inter-organizational collaboration, not-invented-here syndrome, trust building, asset sharing, time to market, product quality, product cost reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review