The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review
Abstract
A plethora of definitions for innovation types has resulted in an ambiguity in the way the terms ‘innovation’ and ‘innovativeness’ are operationalized and utilized in the new product development literature. The terms radical, really‐new, incremental and discontinuous are used ubiquitously to identify innovations. One must question, what is the difference between these different classifications? To date consistent definitions for these innovation types have not emerged from the new product research community. A review of the literature from the marketing, engineering, and new product development disciplines attempts to put some clarity and continuity to the use of these terms. This review shows that it is important to consider both a marketing and technological perspective as well as a macrolevel and microlevel perspective when identifying innovations. Additionally, it is shown when strict classifications from the extant literature are applied, a significant shortfall appears in empirical work directed toward radical and really new innovations. A method for classifying innovations is suggested so that practitioners and academics can talk with a common understanding of how a specific innovation type is identified and how the innovation process may be unique for that particular innovation type. A recommended list of measures based on extant literature is provided for future empirical research concerning technological innovations and innovativeness. “A rose is a rose is a rose. And a rose by any other name would smell just as sweet.” Gertrude Stein & William Shakespeare
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
The Theory of Economic Development
Schumpeter, J. A., & Backhaus, U. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 · Cited by 22,757
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393549 · Cited by 8,563
Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators
Damanpour, F. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256406 · Cited by 6,542
Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392832 · Cited by 6,188
The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
Christensen, C. M. (2013) · University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) · Cited by 3,708
A dynamic model of process and product innovation
Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975) · Omega · doi:10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7 · Cited by 3,493
Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change
Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393511 · Cited by 3,255
Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process
Rosenberg, H. R., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1940) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1839798 · Cited by 2,972
Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction
Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6 · Cited by 2,775
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Freeman C., 1991, Technology and productivity‐the challenge for economic policy, 303
- Johnson SC, 1957, How to organize for new products, Harvard Business Review, 5, 49
- Leonard‐BartonD WilsonE.Commercializing technology: imaginative understanding of user needs. Case study N9–694–102. Cambridge MA :Harvard Business School 1994.
- MilesRE SnowCC.Organizational strategy structure process. New York :McGraw‐Hill Publishing Company 1978.
- Moriarty RT, 1990, High‐tech concept, continuity, and change, IEEE Engineering Management Review, 3, 25
- OECD, 1991, The nature of innovation and the evolution of the productive system, technology and productivity-the challenge for economic policy, 303
- RogersEM.Diffusion of innovations. New York :The Free Press 1995.
- 10.1111/1540-5885.1520111 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
A Multi‐Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydın, M. (2009) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x · Cited by 3,667
Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation
West, J., & Bogers, M. L. A. M. (2013) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12125 · Cited by 2,101
The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations
Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K., & Tse, D. K. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.69.2.42.60756 · Cited by 1,785
Effects of innovation types on firm performance
Günday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kılıç, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014 · Cited by 1,798
Metadata
- Authors
- Garcia, R., & Calantone, R.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Garcia, Rosanna
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 110-132
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5885
- OpenAlex
- W2109783817
- Cited by
- 3,470
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 71 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 160 · 2021: 192 · 2020: 210 · 2019: 198 · 2018: 230 · 2017: 201 · 2016: 204 · 2015: 230 · 2014: 231 · 2013: 236 · 2012: 181
- FWCI
- 143.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Product Innovation Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Product Development and Customization
- Keywords
- innovation types, innovativeness, new product development, radical innovation, incremental innovation, discontinuous innovation, innovation classification, innovation measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review