Exposure Reduction or Retaliation? The Effects of Domestic Violence Resources on Intimate-Partner Homicide
Abstract
Rates of homicide involving intimate partners have declined substantially over the past 25 years in the United States, while public awareness of and policy responses to domestic violence have grown. To what extent has the social response to domestic violence contributed to the decline in intimate-partner homicide? We evaluate the relationship between intimate-partner homicide and domestic violence prevention resources in 48 large cities between 1976 and 1996. Controlling for other influences, several types of prevention resources are linked to lower levels of intimate-partner homicide, which we interpret in terms of their capacity to effectively reduce victims' exposure to abusive or violent partners. Other resources, however, are related to higher levels of homicide, suggesting a retaliation effect when interventions stimulate increased aggression without adequately reducing exposure. In light of other research on deficiencies in accessing and implementing prevention resources, our results suggest that too little exposure reduction in severely violent relationships may be worse than none at all.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621794 · Cited by 10,127 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intimate Partner Homicide: Review and Implications of Research and Policy
Campbell, J. C., Glass, N., Sharps, P. W., Laughon, K., & Bloom, T. (2007) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838007303505 · Cited by 698 · see citing works
Pratt, T. C., Holtfreter, K., & Reisig, M. D. (2010) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0022427810365903 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Palmer, M. L., Keilholtz, B. M., Vail, S. L., & Spencer, C. M. (2024) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12992 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dugan, L., Nagin, D. S., & Rosenfeld, R.
- Venue
- Law & Society Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 169-198
- ISSN
- 0023-9216 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5893
- OpenAlex
- W2142772149
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Law & Society Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- intimate partner homicide, domestic violence, large cities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review