The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managing Networks: Propositions on What Managers Do and Why They Do It
Open accessAbstract
Measuring management in networks is difficult because the allocation of managerial resources in network structures is fluid—that is, the utilization of management behaviors varies across time and space within a given program or project. As a means of focusing the network management research agenda, propositions based in contingency logic are suggested to test ideas regarding when, why, and how network managers undertake these behaviors. The propositions are intended to identify the vast inventory of network management behaviors and, most importantly, determine how the manager strategically matches behaviors with the governing context. Suggestions are also offered to help us understand how and why managerial resources are re allocated over time and space. The proposed research agenda is offered as a guide to help us determine which choices are most likely to be effective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338
Cited by
Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It
McGuire, M. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x · Cited by 933
Self-citationNETWORKING LITERATURE ABOUT DETERMINANTS OF NETWORK EFFECTIVENESS
TURRINI, A., CRISTOFOLI, D., FROSINI, F., & NASI, G. (2009) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01791.x · Cited by 447
THE LIMITATIONS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT NETWORKS
McGUIRE, M., & AGRANOFF, R. (2011) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01917.x · Cited by 340
Self-citationDesperately Seeking Selznick: Cooptation and the Dark Side of Public Management in Networks
O'Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2004) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00415.x · Cited by 310
Building bridges from the margins: The work of leadership in social change organizations
Ospina, S., & Foldy, E. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.008 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- McGuire, M.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 599-609
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W1985881756
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing Networks: Propositions on What Managers Do and Why They Do It. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1540-6210.00240
- The paper
- McGuire, M. (2002). Managing Networks: Propositions on What Managers Do and Why They Do It. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.