The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Proposal for a Goodness‐of‐Fit Test to the Arnason‐Schwarz Multisite Capture‐Recapture Model
Abstract
Summary. In an analysis of capture‐recapture data, the identification of a model that fits is a critical step. For the multisite (also called multistate) models used to analyze data gathered at several sites, no reliable test for assessing fit is currently available. We propose a test for the JMV model, a simple generalization of the Arnason‐Schwarz (AS) model, in the form of interpretable contingency tables. For the AS model, we suggest complementing the test for the JMV model with a likelihood ratio test of AS vs. JMV. The examination of an example leads us to propose further a partitioning that emphasizes the role of the memory model of Brownie et al. (1993 Biometrics49, 1173–1187) as a biologically more plausible alternative to the AS model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lebreton, J.-D., Burnham, K. P., Clobert, J., & Anderson, D. R. (1992) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937171 · Cited by 4,517
Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach
Strawderman, R. L., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2000) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2669574 · Cited by 4,194
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (1998) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2917-7 · Cited by 3,387
The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters.
Cormack, R. M., & Seber, G. A. F. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531423 · Cited by 3,289
Cox, D. R., & Hinkley, D. V. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2887-0 · Cited by 3,089
Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model
Jolly, G. M. (1965) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/52.1-2.225 · Cited by 2,605
Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss—Newton method
WEDDERBURN, R. W. M. (1974) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/61.3.439 · Cited by 2,122
A note on the multiple-recapture census
Seber, G. A. F. (1965) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/52.1-2.249 · Cited by 1,928
Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals
CORMACK, R. M. (1964) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/51.3-4.429 · Cited by 1,342
Design and Analysis Methods for Fish Survival Experiments Based on Release-Recapture.
Lakhani, K. H., Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R., White, G. C., Brownie, C., & Pollock, K. H. (1988) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2403770 · Cited by 1,210
Cited by
Nutrition integrates environmental responses of ungulates.
Parker, K. L., Barboza, P. S., & Gillingham, M. P. (2009) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01528.x · Cited by 686
BOHEC, C. L., GAUTHIER‐CLERC, M., GRÉMILLET, D., PRADEL, R., BÉCHET, A., GENDNER, J., & MAHO, Y. L. (2007) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01268.x · Cited by 79
Self-citationOro, D., Martínez-Abraín, A., Villuendas, E., Sarzo, B., Mínguez, E., Carda, J., & Genovart, M. (2011) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.018 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Pradel, R., Wintrebert, C. M. A., & Gimenez, O.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-53
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0420
- OpenAlex
- W2002020129
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 16.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Proposal for a Goodness‐of‐Fit Test to the Arnason‐Schwarz Multisite Capture‐Recapture Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1541-0420.00006
- The paper
- Pradel, R., Wintrebert, C. M. A., & Gimenez, O. (2003). A Proposal for a Goodness‐of‐Fit Test to the Arnason‐Schwarz Multisite Capture‐Recapture Model. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0420.00006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
