The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Production of yeast cell wall polysaccharides‐β‐glucan and chitin by using food waste substrates: Biosynthesis, production, extraction, and purification methods
Open accessAbstract
Food waste causes significant environmental and economic challenges worldwide, prompting many nations to prioritize its reduction and recycling. As a nutrient‐rich material containing vitamins, proteins, and carbohydrates, it serves as a promising substrate for the cultivation of single‐cell microorganisms like yeast. Yeast cell wall polysaccharides (YCWPs), particularly chitin and β‐glucans, offer valuable applications in food, pharmaceuticals, and bioprocessing. This review highlights the biosynthesis, production, extraction, and purification of YCWP cultivated on food waste substrates. Key species including Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Pichia pastoris , and Candida spp. are discussed, with a focus on optimizing chitin and β‐glucan yield through mechanical, chemical, and enzymatic extraction methods. In addition, the structural and functional properties of β‐glucans and chitin in maintaining cell wall stability are explored, emphasizing their potential as prebiotics, dietary fibers, and biodegradable packaging materials. This review also examines the valorization of food waste in yeast cultivation, presenting a sustainable bioprocessing strategy for transforming waste into valuable bioproducts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cell wall of M. guilliermondii is composed predominantly of β-glucans and only minor amounts of chitin.
“the cell wall of M. guilliermondii is composed predominantly of β-glucans and only minor amounts of chitin,43”
From Yeast to the rescue: Meyerozyma guilliermondii primes tomato vigor and resistance to Fusarium crown and root rot (2025) · cites this paper as [43]
The Biosynthesis of YCWPs section describes β-glucans as a dominant component of yeast cell walls and chitin as relatively scarce. The Extraction Methods section reports β-glucan extraction from Candida guilliermondii, but our copy does not establish the relative β-glucan and chitin content of M. guilliermondii specifically; it also cautions that cell-wall composition varies between species. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assembly of the Yeast Cell Wall
Cabib, E., Farkas, V., Kosík, O., Blanco, N., Arroyo, J., & McPhie, P. (2008) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m804274200 · Cited by 100
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 137
- 10.4315/0362‐028X.JFP‐17‐412 · DOI
- 10.24925/turjaf.v9i6.968‐974.3758 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mycmed.2024.101493 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11694‐022‐01468‐1 · DOI
- 10.3390/molecules26082113 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121439 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.141 · DOI
- 10.3390/bioengineering7010028 · DOI
- 10.1002/jctb.6325 · DOI
- 10.3390/app13052807 · DOI
- 10.1002/yea.873 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27896 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127557 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118826 · DOI
- 10.3390/molecules27144616 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.110.5.1833 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130708 · DOI
- 10.3390/jof9010089 · DOI
- 10.1128/mcb.13.10.6346‐6356.1993 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.3672305 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/toxins11040192 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12934‐024‐02305‐4 · DOI
- 10.1007/S12649‐019‐00641‐W · DOI
- 10.1128/ec.00228‐09 · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.180.19.5030‐5037.1998 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bcab.2022.102298 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107963 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gene.2022.147041 · DOI
- 10.4236/fns.2023.1410061 · DOI
- 10.21323/2618‐9771‐2021‐4‐1‐12‐18 · DOI
- 10.1007/S12010‐021‐03553‐5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108496 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.15294/biosaintifika.v13i1.26754 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102340 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103917 · DOI
- 10.14393/BJ‐v35n2a2019‐42109 · DOI
- 10.34117/bjdv8n8‐081 · DOI
- 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2137 · DOI
- European Union, 2011, Authorising the placing on the market of yeast beta‐glucans as a novel food ingredient under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council
- European Union, 2017, Authorising an extension of use of yeast beta‐glucans as a novel food ingredient under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council
- 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.07.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113284 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.093 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02993 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/J.CLCE.2023.100112 · DOI
- 10.1080/14786419.2017.1332617 · DOI
- 10.22302/iribb.jur.mp.v91i1.508 · DOI
- 10.1128/mmbr.00038‐05 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119152 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13399‐022‐02415‐2 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586‐023‐05856‐5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0502324102 · DOI
- 10.1128/EC.00200‐06 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.094 · DOI
- 10.1007/S11274‐022‐03468‐1 · DOI
- 10.1007/S00217‐018‐3143‐Z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.pep.2023.106294 · DOI
- 10.1002/BTPR.3491 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.138488 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fbio.2021.101406 · DOI
- 10.1002/yea.1349 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105999 · DOI
- 10.3390/foods13121892 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M110.174060 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mib.2010.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/fsn3.2318 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.125 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tcsw.2021.100061 · DOI
- 10.3390/jof7020128 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108253 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106210 · DOI
- 10.1007/S13197‐018‐3107‐0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1051/e3sconf/202020304010 · DOI
- 10.1128/mcb.10.6.3013‐3019.1990 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125791 · DOI
- 10.1080/10408398.2019.1706444 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1567‐1364.2008.00473.x · DOI
- 10.1042/bj3470741 · DOI
- 10.18081/mjas/2019‐7/230‐243 · DOI
- 10.3390/jof6040356 · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.175.2.386‐394.1993 · DOI
- 10.3390/molecules27196313 · DOI
- 10.1021/acssynbio.4c00436 · DOI
- 10.1007/s004380051084 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.E12‐01‐0033 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.112.144485 · DOI
- 10.1038/emboj.2012.268 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02294 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.05.026 · DOI
- 10.32508/stdj.v23i3.2051 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cofs.2024.101173 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-60327-210-0_19 · DOI
- 10.1134/s1607672906040144 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304‐4165(98)00138‐X · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102346 · DOI
- 10.1021/pr050477f · DOI
- 10.1007/s12649‐023‐02382‐3 · DOI
- 10.3390/bioengineering9110623 · DOI
- Sengül M., 2022, Therapeutic and functional properties of beta‐glucan and its effects on health, Eurasian Journal of Food Science and Technology, 6, 29
- 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735885 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1361‐6463/ABB624 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0046386 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.07.045 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.04.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.087 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11694‐019‐00085‐9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.001 · DOI
- 10.1007/S11274‐020‐02840‐3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119457 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123897 · DOI
- 10.4161/cc.8.18.9542 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.02.043 · DOI
- 10.3390/separations9070178 · DOI
- 10.1007/S12649‐017‐0130‐8 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcs.2023.103818 · DOI
- 10.11118/actaun202068010119 · DOI
- 10.3390/polym15163481 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.114.1.101 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jtice.2022.104235 · DOI
- 10.3390/app122211471 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115969 · DOI
- 10.1007/S11274‐018‐2508‐6 · DOI
- 10.1002/elsc.201700125 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133766 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.TIFS.2021.03.025 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106012 · DOI
- 10.1002/jsfa.10186 · DOI
- 10.3390/molecules27041393 · DOI
- 10.3390/agriculture10040126 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.adh7820 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.035 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2024.112136 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.7.12.1909 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kthiri, Z., Ben Jabeur, M., Karmous, C., & Hamada, W. (2025) · Plant Signaling & Behavior · doi:10.1080/15592324.2025.2596486
“42 Taking into consideration that the cell wall of M. guilliermondii is composed predominantly of β -glucans and only minor amounts of chitin, 43 β -glucan–rich cell wall fragments released from the yeast may act as microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) recognized by plant β -glucan…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Günal‐Köroğlu, D., Karabulut, G., Mohammadian, F., Can Karaca, A., Capanoglu, E., & Esatbeyoglu, T.
- Affiliations
- Istanbul Technical University (TR)
- Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Food Engineering Sakarya University Sakarya Türkiye
- Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
- Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering Istanbul Technical University Istanbul Türkiye
- Corresponding author
- Esatbeyoglu, Tuba
- Venue
- Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-04-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e70161-e70161
- ISSN
- 1541-4337 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11970350
- OpenAlex
- W4409183017
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 14
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Istanbul Technical University Academic Open Archive (Istanbul Technical University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (cc-by)
- Funders
- Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover
- Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Fungal Biology and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Keywords
- yeast cell wall polysaccharides, β-glucan, chitin, food waste valorization, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia pastoris, Candida, polysaccharide synthesis, polysaccharide extraction, polysaccharide purification, cell wall stability, prebiotics, dietary fiber, biodegradable packaging, waste recycling
- MeSH terms
- Food Loss and Waste, Cell Wall, Chitin, Polysaccharides, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Yeasts, beta-Glucans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review