Cited by 6Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisAnalytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Development and validation of a combined selected ion monitoring‐scan GC ‐ EI ‐ MS method for nitazene analogs

Phelps, Claire, Hardwick, Emma K., Couch, Alleigh N., Davidson, J. Tyler·2025·Journal of Forensic Sciences

Abstract

Novel synthetic opioids (NSOs) emerged during the third wave of the opioid epidemic, which has resulted in countless overdose deaths. Although fentanyl and fentanyl analogs are the most common NSOs, changing legislation in China and the United States led to the emergence of another class of NSOs, known as nitazene analogs. Nitazene analogs are very potent, and given their increasing prevalence in seized drug casework, it is imperative that seized drug laboratories have sufficient methods to identify nitazene analogs. This study developed a combined selected ion monitoring (SIM)-scan method to identify 20 nitazene analogs using gas chromatography-electron ionization-mass spectrometry (GC-EI-MS). The method was evaluated in terms of the limit of detection (LOD), carryover, selectivity, repeatability, reproducibility, and processed sample stability. The LOD for the targeted nitazene analogs ranged from 5 to 10 ppm due to increased sensitivity through SIM acquisition. No carryover was observed, and all nitazene analogs could be differentiated from other analogs and common interferences. The repeatability and reproducibility of the method were demonstrated qualitatively. All nitazene analogs were stable at room temperature for at least 24 hours. When applied to the analysis of blind simulant samples, 33 out of 35 samples were correctly identified, with the two misidentifications being due to ion ratios outside of tolerance. Likewise, two authentic nitazene analog casework samples were also correctly identified. The validated SIM-scan method provides a potential solution to identify low concentration nitazene analogs in seized drug casework that might otherwise be missed using routine GC-MS full scan acquisition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1556-4029.70084

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older gas chromatography-mass spectrometry methods frequently lack the necessary sensitivity for nitazenes, often missing them in casework.

    “Furthermore, older gas chromatography–mass spectrometry methods also frequently lack the necessary sensitivity for nitazenes, often missing them in casework [50,51,52].”

    From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [51]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phelps, C., Hardwick, E. K., Couch, A. N., & Davidson, J. T.
Affiliations
Sam Houston State University (US)
Corresponding author
Davidson, J. Tyler
Venue
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-05-19
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
1949-1962
ISSN
  • 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4029
OpenAlex
W4410523062
Cited by
6
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Forensic Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Commerce (60NANB23D092)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
synthetic opioids, selected ion monitoring, carryover, sample stability
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Humans, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Thiazoles, Designer Drugs, Reproducibility of Results, Forensic Toxicology, Limit of Detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review