CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 181Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime Patterns and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DOES IMPRISONMENT ALTER THE LIFE COURSE? EVIDENCE ON CRIME AND EMPLOYMENT FROM A NATURAL EXPERIMENT

Open access
LOEFFLER, CHARLES E.·2013·Criminology
DOI 10.1111/1745-9125.12000
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ex‐prisoners consistently manifest high rates of criminal recidivism and unemployment. Existing explanations for these poor outcomes emphasize the stigmatizing effects of imprisonment on prisoners seeking postrelease employment as well as the deleterious effects of imprisonment on prisoners’ attitudes and capabilities. However, these explanations must be distinguished from selection effects in the criminal sentencing process, which also could explain some or all of these poor outcomes. To distinguish between criminogenic and selection explanations for ex‐prisoners’ postrelease experience, I analyze data from a natural experiment in which criminal cases were assigned randomly to judges with sizable sentencing disparities. Using these exogenous sentencing disparities, I produce unbiased estimates of the causal effects of imprisonment on the life course. The results of this analysis suggest that selection effects could be sufficiently large to account for prisoners’ poor postrelease outcomes because judges with large sentencing disparities in their use of imprisonment had similarly high caseload unemployment and criminal recidivism rates.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1745-9125.12000

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 92 references

4 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Bartolomeo John, 1981, Sentencing Decision‐Making: The Logic of Sentence Decisions and the Extent and Sources of Sentencing Disparity
  2. Berecochea John, 1981, Time Served in Prison and Parole Outcome: An Experimental Study
  3. Borjas George, 2005, Labor Economics
  4. Bureau of Justice Assistance, 2005, Review of the Cook County Felony Case Process and Its Impact on the Jail Population
  5. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2003, Education and Correctional Populations
  6. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2010, Prisoners at Yearend 2009–Advanced Counts
  7. Cullen Francis T., 1978, University of Nebraska Studies
  8. Freeman Richard B., 1992, Urban Labor Markets and Job Opportunity
  9. Gaudet Frederick, 1946, The differences between judges in the granting of sentences to probation, Temple Law Quarterly, 19, 471
  10. Gottfredson Don M., 1998, Choosing Punishments: Crime Control Effects of Sentences
  11. Holzer Harry J., 2007, The effect of an applicant's criminal history on employer hiring decisions and screening practices: Evidence from Los Angeles. In Barriers to Reentry? The Labor Market for Released Prisoners in Post‐Industrial America
  12. Irwin John, 1970, The Felon
  13. Irwin John, 2005, The Warehouse Prison: Disposal of the New Dangerous Underclass
  14. Kyckelhahn Tracey, 2010, Justice Expenditure and Employment Extracts, 2007
  15. Partridge Anthony, 1974, The Second Circuit Sentencing Study: A Report to the Judges of the Second Circuit
  16. Pettit Becky, 2007, Barriers to Reentry? The Labor Market for Released Prisoners in Post‐Industrial America
  17. 10.1080/00031305.1985.10479383 · DOI
  18. Sabol William, 2007, Barriers to Reentry? The Labor Market for Released Prisoners in Post‐Industrial America
  19. 10.2307/799046 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Tyler John H., 2007, Barriers to Reentry? The Labor Market for Released Prisoners in Post‐Industrial America
  21. Wilkins Leslie T., 1958, A small comparative study of the results of probation, British Journal of Criminology, 8, 201

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–181 of 181

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
LOEFFLER, C. E.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
LOEFFLER, CHARLES E.
ORCID
LOEFFLER, CHARLES E.
Venue
Criminology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-24
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
137-166
ISSN
  • 0011-1384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9125
DOI
10.1111/1745-9125.12000
OpenAlex
W2167969514
Cited by
181
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
FWCI
32.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Criminology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
incarceration, recidivism, post-release employment, unemployment, selection effects, sentencing disparities, judges, life course, criminogenic effects, stigmatization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review