Minor‐focused sextortion by adult strangers: A crime script analysis of newspaper and court cases
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Sextortion is a form of image‐based sexual abuse in which an offender threatens to distribute sexually explicit images, videos, or information to gain victim compliance. In some sextortion incidents involving minor children, offenders are adult strangers who coerce victims into self‐producing child sexually abusive materials (CSAM). Despite the growing concern regarding minor victims of sextortion, there is a lack of empirical investigation of adult offenders who exclusively target minor children for the production of CSAM and the steps and decisions these offenders take to commit sextortion. Utilizing a sample of 130 minor‐focused sextortion cases gathered from news media and court documents, the current study employed crime script analysis and inductive qualitative methodology to investigate how adult offenders commit sextortion. The results indicated that adult offenders specifically targeting minor children move through several crime scripts: preparation, entry, instrumental actions, crime commission, and exit. Policy Implications: Minor‐focused sextortion perpetrated by adult offenders is executed in stages, each with accompanying preventive solutions. Investing in education that teaches youth to recognize grooming, develops safety practices online, and removes barriers to reporting should be a priority for schools and parents. Increased adoption of technology and policies that would allow social media platforms to detect CSAM, remove fraudulent accounts, and streamline reporting would also disrupt these crimes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf00988593 · Cited by 11,133 · see citing works
Bates, S. (2017) · Feminist Criminology · doi:10.1177/1557085116654565 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Sextortion of Minors: Characteristics and Dynamics
Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., Walsh, W., & Treitman, L. (2018) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.014 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Getting into the Script of Adult Child Sex Offenders and Mapping out Situational Prevention Measures
Leclerc, B., Wortley, R., & Smallbone, S. (2011) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0022427810391540 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
The prevalence of unwanted online sexual exposure and solicitation among youth: A meta-analysis
Madigan, S., Villani, V., Azzopardi, C., Laut, D., Smith, T., Temple, J. R., Browne, D., & Dimitropoulos, G. (2018) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.03.012 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Kloess, J. A., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E., & Beech, A. R. (2019) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063217720927 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Gámez‐Guadix, M., Mateos‐Pérez, E., Wachs, S., Wright, M., Martínez, J., & Íncera, D. (2022) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1002/jad.12064 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Kloess, J. A., Seymour-Smith, S., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E., Long, M. L., Shipley, D., & Beech, A. R. (2017) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063215612442 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Image-based sexual abuse: Victims and perpetrators
Henry, N., Flynn, A., & Powell, A. (2019) · doi:10.52922/ti09975 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Offender strategies for engaging children in online sexual activity
Joleby, M., Lunde, C., Landström, S., & Jonsson, L. S. (2021) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105214 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Suicidal Ideation Among Male Victim-Survivors of Financial Sextortion
Liggett O’Malley, R., & Smith, K. (2025) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2024.2379818 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Love as Bait: A Scoping Review and Crime Script Analysis of Online Romance Scams
Schokkenbroek, J. M., & Snaphaan, T. (2026) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380251361046 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“…review identified that the majority of existing crime scripts focus on cybercrime (for more recent examples, see also Leclerc et al., 2021; O’Malley et al., 2023)—a trend that is unsurprising given the relatively recent emergence of these forms of offending, and the resulting need for a…”
Constructing Offender Typologies From Judicial Data: A Clustering Analysis of Sextortion Cases
Wang, F., & Pei, W. (2026) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/10790632261434143
“…also diverges from traditional minor-focused models by emphasizing fi nancially motivated coercion rather than material accumulation or direct sexual exploitation, re fl ecting a growing trend in fi - nancially driven sextortion targeting minors (Greening, 2025; O ’ Malley, 2023; Thorn, 2024b).”
- Authors
- O'Malley, R. L., Holt, K., Holt, T. J., & Rodriguez, J.
- Affiliations
- University of South Florida Sarasota Florida USA
- Michigan State University (US)
- Venue
- Criminology & Public Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-07-21
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 779-801
- ISSN
- 1538-6473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9133
- OpenAlex
- W4387428162
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Criminology & Public Policy (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Keywords
- sextortion, child pornography, crime scripts, image-based sexual abuse, online grooming, barriers to reporting, online safety education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review