Cited by 5Pharmacy and Medical PracticesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Nutritional intake of opioid replacement therapy patients in community pharmacies: A pilot study

Waddington, Freya, Naunton, Mark, Kyle, Greg, Cooper, Gabrielle·2015·Nutrition & Dietetics

Abstract

Abstract Aim Opioid replacement therapy (ORT) is an established therapy for a patient group that has been associated with nutrition‐related comorbidities. This paper aims to assess the nutritional intake and supplementation in ORT patients, determine the extent of nutritional/dietary advice supplied to ORT patients and to briefly examine patients' perception of pharmacists' provision of nutritional advice. Methods The nutritional intake of ORT patients receiving treatment in community pharmacies within the Australian Capital Territory was assessed via a 24‐hour recall survey. Food intake data were analysed via nutrient analysis software and compared with Australian Nutrition Reference Values and the nutrient intakes of the Australian population. Patients were surveyed to determine supplement use and perceptions of nutritional advice gained by pharmacists. Results Potential insufficient intake of various macronutrients and micronutrients was observed in both sexes. Less than 25% of patients recorded supplement use. Fifteen percent of males and 21% of females stated that they had approached a pharmacist with a nutrition‐related query. All patients who received nutritional advice followed the advice. Conclusions ORT patients dosing at community pharmacies appear to have poor nutritional intake. ORT patients appear to be receptive to pharmacist's advice. Community pharmacists can potentially increase the beneficial health outcomes in this population through the proactive supply of accurate nutritional advice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1747-0080.12192

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Waddington, F., Naunton, M., Kyle, G., & Cooper, G.
Affiliations
University of Canberra (AU)
Corresponding author
Waddington, Freya
Venue
Nutrition & Dietetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-28
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
276-283
ISSN
  • 1446-6368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-0080
OpenAlex
W1603878629
Cited by
5
References
31
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition & Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Canberra Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Faculty of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
opioid substitution therapy, nutritional intake, community pharmacy, dietary supplementation, micronutrient deficiency, macronutrient intake, patient perspectives, 24-hour dietary recall, Australian Capital Territory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review