Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protein supplements and adolescent athletes: A pilot study investigating the risk knowledge, motivations and prevalence of use

Whitehouse, Gavin, Lawlis, Tanya·2017·Nutrition & Dietetics

Abstract

Aim: Protein‐based sports supplements are among the more common types of nutrition supplements consumed by athletes; however, there is currently limited data investigating the knowledge, motivations and occurrence of use among the adolescent population (13–18 years). This pilot study looks to obtain initial data regarding the use of protein supplements in this population. Methods: This study investigates the understanding and occurrence of protein supplement use in 87 adolescent athletes based in an Australian capital city who compete in a variety of sports. Sources of information, regularity of use, purchasing habits, associated risk knowledge and supplement beliefs were examined using a self‐reported, written questionnaire. Results: A total of 60% (n = 52) of athletes reported using protein supplements, with a positive relationship between age and use (P < 0.05); 48 participants (55%) perceived risks associated with protein supplement consumption, with the most common risk reported as ‘I don't know’ (22%). Coaches were found to initiate protein supplement use more than other figures in the athlete's life (50%) and were the primary source of information regarding supplements (58%). It was found that 19% of adolescent athletes obtained information about protein supplements from the Internet, and 17% of all consumers purchase their supplements online. Conclusions: The evident lack of knowledge regarding protein supplements demonstrates a necessity for further education of athletes, coaches and families regarding the responsible purchasing and use of protein supplements in the current landscape of sports nutrition. Future research should further explore the role of the Internet in protein supplement purchase and education.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1747-0080.12367

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.7196/sajsm.552 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/jn/127.5.869S · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1080/02640410701607395 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1007/978-1-59745-231-1_1 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.arr.2011.12.008 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Australian Government, 2015, Australian Regulatory Guidelines for Complementary Medicines
  7. 10.1016/j.fct.2010.11.014 · DOI
  8. 10.1079/NRR2006122 · DOI
  9. 10.3945/jn.113.176651 · DOI
  10. World Anti‐Doping Agency, 2014, 2013 Anti Doping Testing Figures—Laboratory Report
  11. 10.1300/J396v27n02_08 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/her/18.1.98 · DOI
  13. MunozE.Dietary supplement use amongst junior college athletes (Master's thesis). University SJS San Jose CA 2008.
  14. 10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00348-3 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1123/ijsnem.19.1.97 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1177/0363546509344071 · DOI
  17. 10.1249/01.mss.0000233790.08788.3e · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.3390/nu8090570 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1080/02652030601013729 · DOI
  20. 10.4085/1062-6050-48.1.16 · DOI

Cited by

See all 43

Metadata

Authors
Whitehouse, G., & Lawlis, T.
Affiliations
School of Public Health and Nutrition, Faculty of Health University of Canberra Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
Venue
Nutrition & Dietetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-26
Volume
74
Issue
5
Pages
509-515
ISSN
  • 1446-6368
  • 1747-0080
Cited by
43
References
9
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.