Cited by 39Carcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentEssential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityEdible Oils Quality and Analysis

Genoprotective effects of essential oil compounds against oxidative and methylated DNA damage in human colon cancer cells

Thapa, Dinesh, Richardson, Anthony J., Zweifel, Béatrice, Wallace, R. John, Gratz, Silvia W.·2019·Journal of Food Science

Abstract

Essential oils (EO) are widely used in foods as flavoring and preservative agents. Many of the biological activities of EO have been attributed to major essential oil compounds (EOC) but their direct interaction with colonic epithelial cells and their genotoxic and genoprotective effects are not well established. In this study, the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of EOC including nerolidol, thymol, geraniol, methylisoeugenol, eugenol, linalool, and a commercial blend (Agolin) were determined. Furthermore, the genoprotective effects of EOC against oxidative and methylating damage were assessed using the comet assay in HT-29 colorectal adenocarcinoma cells. The majority of EOC were cytotoxic to HT-29 cells at or above 250 ppm after 24 hr exposure. At noncytotoxic doses, none of the EOC was genotoxic in the comet assay. Genoprotection against oxidative DNA damage was observed for nerolidol (at 62.5 ppm), thymol (at 12.5 ppm), geraniol, and methylisoeugenol (both at 125 ppm), as well as linalool and Agolin (both at 250 ppm). Thymol was the most protective compound against oxidative DNA damage and geraniol (at 125 ppm) also protected cells against methylating DNA damage. This study highlights the potential of EOC such as thymol to protect the colonic epithelium against oxidative DNA damage and geraniol against methylating DNA damage. Further in vivo studies are needed to confirm these findings for safety and efficacy to exploit their potential pharmaceutical or nutraceutical uses for colonic health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1750-3841.14665

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thapa, D., Richardson, A. J., Zweifel, B., Wallace, R. J., & Gratz, S. W.
Affiliations
  • Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Agolin SA 1145 Bière Switzerland
Corresponding author
Gratz, Silvia W.
Venue
Journal of Food Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-17
Volume
84
Issue
7
Pages
1979-1985
ISSN
  • 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3841
OpenAlex
W2952071840
Cited by
39
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Food Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Keywords
essential oil constituents, genoprotective effect, oxidative DNA damage, thymol, geraniol, nerolidol, linalool, eugenol, HT-29 cells, colorectal cancer, colonic epithelium, cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, nutraceuticals
MeSH terms
Acyclic Monoterpenes, Colonic Neoplasms, DNA Damage, Eugenol, Humans, Oils, Volatile, Terpenes, Thymol, Oxidative Stress, DNA Methylation, Protective Agents, Comet Assay, Monoterpenes, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review