Cited by 13Coconut Research and ApplicationsFood and Agricultural SciencesPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management

Discrimination and characterization of different coconut water (CW) by their phenolic composition and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using LC-MS/MS, HS-SPME-GC-MS, and HS-GC-IMS

Open access
Zhang, Wende, Chen, Yang, Yun, Yonghuan, Li, Congfa, Fang, Yajing, Zhang, Weimin·2023·Journal of Food Science

Abstract

Three varieties of coconut ( Cocos nucifera L.) water (CW) at two maturity stages were investigated for physicochemical and nutritional properties. The profile of phenolic compounds and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was determined by liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS), headspace solid‐phase microextraction‐gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (HS‐SPME‐GC‐MS), and headspace‐gas chromatography‐ion mobility spectrometry (HS‐GC‐IMS). Most of the properties of CW changed significantly with maturity rather than variety. The five most relevant phenolic compounds in CW were chlorogenic acid, 4‐hydroxy‐3,5‐dimethoxycinnamic acid, L ‐epicatechin, and procyanidins B2 and B1. Variety played a more important role in phenolic composition than maturity, and Wenye No. 4 can be distinguished from other two varieties. Alcohols and esters were the main VOCs in CW identified by HS‐GC‐IMS and HS‐SPME‐GC‐MS, respectively. Five and four compounds (VIP scores > 1) were characteristic compounds for CW by HS‐GC‐IMS and HS‐SPME‐GC‐MS, respectively. The VOCs of Wenye Nos. 2 and 3 were more similar than those of Wenye No. 4. These findings could provide useful information for the selection of raw materials of CW used for different industrial purposes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1750-3841.16711

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, W., Chen, Y., Yun, Y., Li, C., Fang, Y., & Zhang, W.
Affiliations
  • Hainan University (CN)
  • School of Food Science and Engineering Hainan University, Key Laboratory of Tropical Fruits and Vegetables Quality and Safety for State Market Regulation, Hainan Institute for Food Control Haikou P. R. China
Corresponding author
  • Fang, Yajing
  • Zhang, Weimin
Venue
Journal of Food Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-08-02
Volume
88
Issue
9
Pages
3758-3772
ISSN
  • 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3841
OpenAlex
W4385469255
Cited by
13
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (22164008)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province (322QN253)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Coconut Research and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Keywords
coconut water, Cocos nucifera, phenolic compounds, volatile organic compounds, coconut varieties, fruit maturity, chlorogenic acid, procyanidins, raw material selection
MeSH terms
Ion Mobility Spectrometry, Chromatography, Liquid, Cocos, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Phenols, Solid Phase Microextraction, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Volatile Organic Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review