Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 74

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of species in the angiosperm family Apiaceae using DNA barcodes

Liu, Jinxin, Shi, Linchun, Han, Jianping, Li, Geng, Lu, Heng, Hou, Jingyi, Zhou, Xiaoteng, Meng, Fanyun, Downie, Stephen R.·2014·Molecular Ecology Resources

Abstract

Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) is a large angiosperm family that includes many medicinally important species. The ability to identify these species and their adulterants is important, yet difficult to do so because of their subtle fruit morphological differences and often lack of diagnostic features in preserved specimens. Moreover, dried roots are often the official medical organs, making visual identification to species almost impossible. DNA barcoding has been proposed as a powerful taxonomic tool for species identification. The Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL) Plant Working Group has recommended the combination of rbcL+matK as the core plant barcode. Recently, the China Plant BOL Group proposed that the nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS), as well as a subset of this marker (ITS 2), be incorporated alongside rbcL+matK into the core barcode for seed plants, particularly angiosperms. In this study, we assess the effectiveness of these four markers plus psbA‐trnH as Apiaceae barcodes. A total of 6032 sequences representing 1957 species in 385 diverse genera were sampled, of which 211 sequences from 50 individuals (representing seven species) were newly obtained. Of these five markers, ITS and ITS 2 showed superior results in intra‐ and interspecific divergence and DNA barcoding gap assessments. For the matched data set (173 samples representing 45 species in five genera), the ITS locus had the highest identification efficiency (73.3%), yet ITS 2 also performed relatively well with 66.7% identification efficiency. The identification efficiency increased to 82.2% when using an ITS+psbA‐trnH marker combination (ITS 2+psbA‐trnH was 80%), which was significantly higher than that of rbcL+matK (40%). For the full sample data set (3052 ITS sequences, 3732 ITS 2 sequences, 1011 psbA‐trnH sequences, 567 matK sequences and 566 rbcL sequences), ITS, ITS 2, psbA‐trnH, matK and rbcL had 70.0%, 64.3%, 49.5%, 38.6% and 32.1% discrimination abilities, respectively. These results confirm that ITS or its subset ITS 2 be incorporated into the core barcode for Apiaceae and that the combination of ITS/ITS 2+psbA‐trnH has much potential value as a powerful, standard DNA barcode for Apiaceae identification.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1755-0998.12262

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1007/s00606-009-0210-8 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.0905845106 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/tax.562004 · DOI
  4. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008613 · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.1104551108 · DOI
  6. 10.1055/s-2007-990227 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.0408302101 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/1755-0998.12046 · DOI
  9. 10.1134/S0006297912090131 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s00606-013-0779-9 · DOI
  11. 10.1017/S0960428601000658 · DOI
  12. 10.1139/b02-119 · DOI
  13. 10.1127/1869-6155/2010/0128-0005 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02842.x · DOI
  15. 10.2307/4117819 · DOI
  16. 10.1186/1471-2148-10-324 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/molbev/msi173 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.0510466103 · DOI
  19. 10.1186/1741-7007-5-24 · DOI
  20. 10.3109/19401736.2012.660924 · DOI
  21. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312 · DOI
  23. Heywood VH, 1993, Flowering Plants of the World
  24. 10.2307/2445819 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.1116812108 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.gene.2008.10.012 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/BF01731581 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000508 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.0503123102 · DOI
  30. Lahaye R, 2008, A test of psbK‐psbI and atpF‐atpH as potential plant DNA barcodes using the flora of the Kruger National Park as a model system (South Africa), Nature Precedings
  31. 10.1073/pnas.0709936105 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s11427-010-4009-1 · DOI
  33. 10.1248/bpb.33.1919 · DOI
  34. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020354 · DOI
  35. National Pharmacopoeia Committee, 2010, Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China
  36. 10.1186/1751-0473-4-1 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/BF02143500 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00328.x · DOI
  39. 10.1371/journal.pone.0048833 · DOI
  40. Pimenov MG, 1993, The Genera of the Umbelliferae: A Nomenclator
  41. 10.2307/2446155 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2011.00133.x · DOI
  43. 10.1371/journal.pone.0043971 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01752.x · DOI
  45. 10.1007/s00606-007-0582-6 · DOI
  46. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1716 · DOI
  47. WhiteTJ BrunsT LeeS TaylorJW(1990)Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications 18 315–322. · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1371/journal.pone.0011533 · DOI
  49. 10.1073/pnas.84.24.9054 · DOI
  50. 10.1055/s-0029-1185385 · DOI
  51. 10.1371/journal.pone.0013102 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/nar/gkg595 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Liu, J., Shi, L., Han, J., Li, G., Lu, H., Hou, J., Zhou, X., Meng, F., & Downie, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Area Major Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Traditional Chinese Medicine Beijing Normal University Beijing 100875 China
  • Institute of Medicinal Plant Development Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100193 China
  • Department of Plant Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL 61801‐3707 USA
Venue
Molecular Ecology Resources
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-14
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
1231-1238
ISSN
  • 1755-098X
  • 1755-0998
Cited by
74
References
1
Language
en
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81072999)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.