The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of species in the angiosperm family Apiaceae using DNA barcodes
Abstract
Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) is a large angiosperm family that includes many medicinally important species. The ability to identify these species and their adulterants is important, yet difficult to do so because of their subtle fruit morphological differences and often lack of diagnostic features in preserved specimens. Moreover, dried roots are often the official medical organs, making visual identification to species almost impossible. DNA barcoding has been proposed as a powerful taxonomic tool for species identification. The Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL) Plant Working Group has recommended the combination of rbcL+matK as the core plant barcode. Recently, the China Plant BOL Group proposed that the nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS), as well as a subset of this marker (ITS 2), be incorporated alongside rbcL+matK into the core barcode for seed plants, particularly angiosperms. In this study, we assess the effectiveness of these four markers plus psbA‐trnH as Apiaceae barcodes. A total of 6032 sequences representing 1957 species in 385 diverse genera were sampled, of which 211 sequences from 50 individuals (representing seven species) were newly obtained. Of these five markers, ITS and ITS 2 showed superior results in intra‐ and interspecific divergence and DNA barcoding gap assessments. For the matched data set (173 samples representing 45 species in five genera), the ITS locus had the highest identification efficiency (73.3%), yet ITS 2 also performed relatively well with 66.7% identification efficiency. The identification efficiency increased to 82.2% when using an ITS+psbA‐trnH marker combination (ITS 2+psbA‐trnH was 80%), which was significantly higher than that of rbcL+matK (40%). For the full sample data set (3052 ITS sequences, 3732 ITS 2 sequences, 1011 psbA‐trnH sequences, 567 matK sequences and 566 rbcL sequences), ITS, ITS 2, psbA‐trnH, matK and rbcL had 70.0%, 64.3%, 49.5%, 38.6% and 32.1% discrimination abilities, respectively. These results confirm that ITS or its subset ITS 2 be incorporated into the core barcode for Apiaceae and that the combination of ITS/ITS 2+psbA‐trnH has much potential value as a powerful, standard DNA barcode for Apiaceae identification.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The combination of ITS/ITS2+psbA-trnH outperforms the rbcL+matK core barcode for Apiaceae identification (Liu et al., 2014).”
From Unlocking the Apiaceae: comprehensive advances in agronomy, biotechnology, phytochemistry, and health applications of major seed spices (2025) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2014
Citations
Cites
DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling
Meyer, C. P., & Paulay, G. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030422 · Cited by 1,957
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- 10.1007/s00606-009-0210-8 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0905845106 · DOI
- 10.1002/tax.562004 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0008613 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1104551108 · DOI
- 10.1055/s-2007-990227 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0408302101 · DOI
- 10.1111/1755-0998.12046 · DOI
- 10.1134/S0006297912090131 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00606-013-0779-9 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0960428601000658 · DOI
- 10.1139/b02-119 · DOI
- 10.1127/1869-6155/2010/0128-0005 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02842.x · DOI
- 10.2307/4117819 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2148-10-324 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msi173 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0510466103 · DOI
- 10.1186/1741-7007-5-24 · DOI
- 10.3109/19401736.2012.660924 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312 · DOI
- Heywood VH, 1993, Flowering Plants of the World
- 10.2307/2445819 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1116812108 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gene.2008.10.012 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01731581 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0000508 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0503123102 · DOI
- Lahaye R, 2008, A test of psbK‐psbI and atpF‐atpH as potential plant DNA barcodes using the flora of the Kruger National Park as a model system (South Africa), Nature Precedings
- 10.1073/pnas.0709936105 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11427-010-4009-1 · DOI
- 10.1248/bpb.33.1919 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020354 · DOI
- National Pharmacopoeia Committee, 2010, Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China
- 10.1186/1751-0473-4-1 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02143500 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00328.x · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0048833 · DOI
- Pimenov MG, 1993, The Genera of the Umbelliferae: A Nomenclator
- 10.2307/2446155 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2011.00133.x · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0043971 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01752.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s00606-007-0582-6 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2005.1716 · DOI
- WhiteTJ BrunsT LeeS TaylorJW(1990)Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications 18 315–322. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0011533 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.84.24.9054 · DOI
- 10.1055/s-0029-1185385 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0013102 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkg595 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Singh, R., Choudhary, S., Kumari, V., Meena, R. S., Meena, N. K., Y, R., & Verma, A. K. (2025) · Journal of Agriculture and Ecology · doi:10.58628/jae-2521-101
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., Shi, L., Han, J., Li, G., Lu, H., Hou, J., Zhou, X., Meng, F., & Downie, S. R.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Area Major Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Traditional Chinese Medicine Beijing Normal University Beijing 100875 China
- Institute of Medicinal Plant Development Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100193 China
- Department of Plant Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL 61801‐3707 USA
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology Resources
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-05-14
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1231-1238
- ISSN
- 1755-098X
- 1755-0998
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81072999)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.