Cited by 76Geochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral DepositsGeological and Geochemical AnalysisGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping

The metallogenetic regularities of lithium deposits in China

Jiankang, LI, Tianren, ZOU, Xifang, LIU, Denghong, WANG, Xin, DING·2015·Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition

Abstract

Abstract Lithium resources support the development of high‐technology industries. China has abundant lithium resources which are mainly distributed in Tibet, Qinghai, Sichuan and Jiangxi. Salt lakes in China have significant lithium reserves, but lithium is mainly produced from hard rock lithium deposits because the extraction from salt lakes requires further improvements. The hard rock lithium deposits mainly occur in granitic pegmatite in the Altay region of Xinjiang and the Jiajika deposit in western Sichuan Province; they mainly formed in the Mesozoic and occurred in a relatively stable stage during orogenic processes. On the basis of the information from 151 lithium deposits or spots, 14 lithium metallogenic series were identified, and granitic pegmatite, granite, and sedimentary types were considered to be the main prediction types of lithium resources. Twelve lithium mineralization belts were divided and a series of maps showing the lithium metallogenetic regularity in China were drawn. We conclude that the hard rock and brine type of lithium resources possibly have a similar lithium source related to magmatism. The metallogenic features of the lithium in China were related with the distinct history of tectonic‐magmatic activity in China. This study benefits the assessment of, and prospecting for, lithium resources in China.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1755-6724.12453

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Jiankang, L., Tianren, Z., Xifang, L., Denghong, W., & Xin, D.
Affiliations
  • Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Resource Assessment Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Beijing 100037 China
  • Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CN)
  • China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN)
Venue
Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
652-670
ISSN
  • 1000-9515 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-6724
OpenAlex
W2025729513
Cited by
76
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Geochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral Deposits
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Keywords
lithium deposits, ore genesis, granitic pegmatites, lithium source, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review