Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 448

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early‐life establishment of the swine gut microbiome and impact on host phenotypes

Mach, Núria, Berri, Mustapha, Estellé, Jordi, Levenez, Florence, Lemonnier, Gaëtan, Denis, Catherine, Leplat, Jean‐Jacques, Chevaleyre, Claire, Billon, Yvon, Doré, Joël, Rogel‐Gaillard, Claire, Lepage, Patricia·2015·Environmental Microbiology Reports

Abstract

Summary: Early bacterial colonization and succession within the gastrointestinal tract has been suggested to be crucial in the establishment of specific microbiota composition and the shaping of host phenotype. Here, the composition and dynamics of faecal microbiomes were studied for 31 healthy piglets across five age strata (days 14, 36, 48, 60 and 70 after birth) together with their mothers. Faecal microbiome composition was assessed by 16 S rRNA gene 454‐pyrosequencing. B acteroidetes and F irmicutes were the predominant phyla present at each age. For all piglets, luminal secretory IgA concentration was measured at day 70, and body weight was recorded until day 70. The microbiota of suckling piglets was mainly represented by B acteroides , O scillibacter, E scherichia/ S higella, L actobacillus and unclassified R uminococcaceae genera. This pattern contrasted with that of A cetivibrio, D ialister, O ribacterium, S uccinivibrio and P revotella genera, which appeared increased after weaning. L actobacillus fermentum might be vertically transferred via breast milk or faeces. The microbiota composition coevolved with their hosts towards two different clusters after weaning, primarily distinguished by unclassified R uminococcaceae and P revotella abundances. P revotella was positively correlated with luminal secretory IgA concentrations, and body weight. Our study opens up new possibilities for health and feed efficiency manipulation via genetic selection and nutrition in the agricultural domain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1758-2229.12285

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Cited by

See all 448

Metadata

Authors
Mach, N., Berri, M., Estellé, J., Levenez, F., Lemonnier, G., Denis, C., Leplat, J., Chevaleyre, C., Billon, Y., Doré, J., Rogel‐Gaillard, C., & Lepage, P.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology Reports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-05-06
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
554-569
ISSN
1758-2229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120668531
Cited by
448
References
72
FWCI
9.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early‐life establishment of the swine gut microbiome and impact on host phenotypes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1758-2229.12285
The paper
Mach, N., Berri, M., Estellé, J., Levenez, F., Lemonnier, G., Denis, C., Leplat, J., Chevaleyre, C., Billon, Y., Doré, J., Rogel‐Gaillard, C., & Lepage, P. (2015). Early‐life establishment of the swine gut microbiome and impact on host phenotypes. Environmental Microbiology Reports. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12285

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.