Environmental filtering improves ecological niche models across multiple scales
Abstract
Abstract A clear challenge for ecological niche modelling is determining how to best mitigate the effects of sampling bias from commonly collected biodiversity data. Recent approaches have focused on filtering occurrences in overrepresented regions based on geographic or environmental proximity. We tested the efficacy of filtering in geographic and environmental space using occurrence data from four species. Our evaluation strategies examined 14 distance measures in geographic and environmental spaces and eight combinations of environmental variables and their ordinations. This resulted in 78 datasets for each species, which we evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), the difference between training and testingAUC, omission rate, the true skill statistic, and Schoener's D to examine the effects of different filtering schemes. The degree of change produced by filtering on predicted suitability and evaluation statistics increased with increasing range size. Environmental filtering resulted in higher model fit at larger extents and retained more occurrences than geographic filtering. Our results indicate that models should be evaluated using multiple evaluation statistics at multiple thresholds. The use of bin sizes when filtering in environmental space allows for simple comparison between species and filter types and makes for an easily reportable and repeatable distance metric. We specifically recommend that ecological niche models using natural history collection data filter in environmental space with variables derived from permutation importance or the first few axes of a principal components ordination.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,706 · see citing works
Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G., & Jarvis, A. (2005) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1276 · Cited by 19,860 · see citing works
Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C. M., Carl, G., Carré, G., Marquéz, J. R. G., Gruber, B., Lafourcade, B., Leitão, P. J., et al. (2012) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x · Cited by 11,116 · see citing works
Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data
Elith*, J., H. Graham*, C., P. Anderson, R., Dudík, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., J. Hijmans, R., Huettmann, F., R. Leathwick, J., Lehmann, A., et al. (2006) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x · Cited by 9,088 · see citing works
Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation
Phillips, S. J., & Dudı́k, M. (2008) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x · Cited by 6,851 · see citing works
Allouche, O., Tsoar, A., & Kadmon, R. (2006) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x · Cited by 5,518 · see citing works
AUC: A misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models
Lobo, J. M., Jiménez‐Valverde, A., & Real, R. (2008) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x · Cited by 3,499 · see citing works
F. Dormann, C., M. McPherson, J., B. Araújo, M., Bivand, R., Bolliger, J., Carl, G., G. Davies, R., Hirzel, A., Jetz, W., Daniel Kissling, W., et al. (2007) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x · Cited by 3,433 · see citing works
Pearson, R. G., Raxworthy, C. J., Nakamura, M., & Peterson, A. T. (2006) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.x · Cited by 3,146 · see citing works
Phillips, S. J., Dudík, M., Elith, J., Graham, C. H., Lehmann, A., Leathwick, J., & Ferrier, S. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/07-2153.1 · Cited by 2,996 · see citing works
Selecting pseudo‐absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many?
Barbet-Massin, M., Jiguet, F., Albert, C., & Thuiller, W. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00172.x · Cited by 2,715 · see citing works
Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models
Wisz, M. S., Hijmans, R. J., Li, J., Peterson, A. T., Graham, C. H., Guisan, A., & NCEAS Predicting Species Distributions Working Group (2008) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00482.x · Cited by 2,514 · see citing works
Aiello‐Lammens, M. E., Boria, R. A., Radosavljević, A., Vilela, B., & Anderson, R. P. (2015) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.01132 · Cited by 2,385 · see citing works
Muscarella, R., Galante, P. J., Soley‐Guardia, M., Boria, R. A., Kass, J. M., Uriarte, M., & Anderson, R. P. (2014) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12261 · Cited by 2,110 · see citing works
Barve, N., Barve, V., Jiménez‐Valverde, A., Lira‐Noriega, A., Maher, S. P., Peterson, A. T., Soberón, J. M., & Villalobos, F. (2011) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.011 · Cited by 1,901 · see citing works
Radosavljevic, A., & Anderson, R. P. (2014) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12227 · Cited by 1,723 · see citing works
Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models
Boria, R., Olson, L., Goodman, S., & Anderson, R. (2014) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.012 · Cited by 1,458 · see citing works
The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models
Kramer‐Schadt, S., Niedballa, J., Pilgrim, J. D., Schröder, B., Lindenborn, J., Reinfelder, V., Stillfried, M., Heckmann, I., Scharf, A. K., Augeri, D. M., et al. (2013) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/ddi.12096 · Cited by 1,321 · see citing works
Fourcade, Y., Engler, J. O., Rödder, D., & Secondi, J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097122 · Cited by 1,175 · see citing works
Jiménez‐Valverde, A. (2011) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00683.x · Cited by 822 · see citing works
Spatial bias in the GBIF database and its effect on modeling species' geographic distributions
Beck, J., Böller, M., Erhardt, A., & Schwanghart, W. (2014) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.11.002 · Cited by 708 · see citing works
Veloz, S. (2009) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02174.x · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Hijmans, R. J. (2012) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/11-0826.1 · Cited by 639 · see citing works
Anderson, R. P., & Raza, A. (2010) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02290.x · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Fourcade, Y., Besnard, A. G., & Secondi, J. (2017) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.12684 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Varela, S., Anderson, R. P., García‐Valdés, R., & Fernández‐González, F. (2014) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00441.x · Cited by 433 · see citing works
A quantitative synthesis of the importance of variables used in MaxEnt species distribution models
Bradie, J. N., & Leung, B. (2016) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12894 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Newbold, T. (2010) · Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/0309133309355630 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Oliveira, U., Paglia, A. P., BRESCOVIT, A. D., de Carvalho, C. J. B., Silva, D. P., de Rezende, D. T., Leite, F. S. F., Batista, J. A. N., Barbosa, J. P. P. P., Stehmann, J. R., et al. (2016) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/ddi.12489 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Incorporating spatial autocorrelation may invert observed patterns
Kühn, I. (2006) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2006.00293.x · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Anderson, R. P. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06440.x · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Taxonomist survey biases and the unveiling of biodiversity patterns
Sastre, P., & Lobo, J. M. (2008) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.11.002 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Atlas of elapid snakes of Australia
Minton, S. A. (1987) · Toxicon · doi:10.1016/0041-0101(87)90280-7 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Feria-Arroyo, T. P., Castro-Arellano, I., Gordillo-Perez, G., Cavazos, A. L., Vargas-Sandoval, M., Grover, A., Torres, J., Medina, R. F., de León, A. A. P., & Esteve-Gassent, M. D. (2014) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-7-199 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Including environmental niche information to improve IUCN Red List assessments
Breiner, F. T., Guisan, A., Nobis, M. P., & Bergamini, A. (2017) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/ddi.12545 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Norris, D. (2014) · Tropical Conservation Science · doi:10.1177/194008291400700311 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Predicted Pleistocene–Holocene range shifts of the tiger (Panthera tigris)
Cooper, D. M., Dugmore, A. J., Gittings, B., et al. (2016) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/ddi.12484 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Dellicour, S., Kastally, C., Varela, S., et al. (2016) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12748 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Limitations of Climatic Data for Inferring Species Boundaries: Insights from Speckled Rattlesnakes
Meik, J. M., Streicher, J. W., Lawing, A. M., et al. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131435 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantifying the similarity between genes and geography across Alaska's alpine small mammals
Knowles, L. L., Massatti, R. T., He, Q., Olson, L. E., & Lanier, H. C. (2016) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12728 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Lawing, A. M., Polly, P. D., Hews, D. K., & Martins, E. P. (2016) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/687202 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationspThin: Functions for Spatial Thinning of Species Occurrence Records for Use in Ecological Models
Aiello‐Lammens, M. E., Boria, R. A., Radosavljević, A., et al. (2014) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.spthin · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Soley‐Guardia, M., Gutiérrez, E. E., Thomas, D. M., Ochoa-G., J., Marisol Aguilera, M., & Anderson, R. P. (2016) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.1900 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Adelino, J. R. P., dos Anjos, L., & Lima, M. R. (2017) · Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.pecon.2017.07.001 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Oliveira, S., Rocha, J., Sousa, C. A., & Capinha, C. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-89096-5 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
megaSDM: Integrating dispersal and time-step analyses into species distribution models
Shipley, B. R., Bach, R., Do, Y., Strathearn, H., McGuire, J. L., & Dilkina, B. (2022) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.05450 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Borges, F. O., Guerreiro, M., Santos, C. P., Paula, J. R., & Rosa, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2022.1018766 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“To mitigate environmental and spatial biases within the occurrence data, the package performs environmental filtering of the occurrence data by dividing the environmental values at each point into a pre-determined number of bins (n = 25 in the present study), and then selecting one point from each unique combination o…”
Method
- Authors
- Castellanos, A. A., Huntley, J. W., Voelker, G., & Lawing, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- American Museum of Natural History (US)
- Corresponding author
- Castellanos, Adrian A.
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-02-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 481-492
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2907346560
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 15.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- environmental filtering, ecological niche modeling, sampling bias, natural history collections, species range size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
