CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 319Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorNoise Effects and ManagementWildlife Ecology and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Guidelines for the use of acoustic indices in environmental research

Open access
Bradfer‐Lawrence, Tom, Gardner, Nick, Bunnefeld, Lynsey, Bunnefeld, Nils, Willis, Stephen G., Dent, Daisy H.·2019·Methods in Ecology and Evolution
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.13254
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ecoacoustics, the study of environmental sound, is a growing field with great potential for biodiversity monitoring. Audio recordings could provide a rapid, cost‐effective monitoring tool offering novel insights into ecosystem dynamics. More than 60 acoustic indices have been developed to date, which reflect distinct attributes of the soundscape, (i.e. the total acoustic energy at a given location, including noise produced by animals, machinery, wind and rain). However, reported patterns in acoustic indices have been contradictory, possibly because there is no accepted best practice for the collection and analysis of audio recordings. Here, we propose: (a) guidelines for designing studies using audio recordings for the rapid assessment of multiple sites; and (b) a workflow for comparing recordings with seven of the most commonly used indices, permitting discrimination among habitat‐specific soundscapes. We collected and analysed over 26,000 hr of recordings from 117 sites across a range of habitats in a human‐modified tropical landscape in central Panama; an order of magnitude more recordings than used in previously published studies. We demonstrate that: (a) Standard error variance of indices stabilizes within 120 hr of recordings from a single location. (b) Continuous recording should be used rather than subsample recording on a schedule; sub sampling is a common practice but delays capture of site variability and maximizing total duration of recording should be prioritized. (c) Use of multiple indices to describe soundscape patterns reveals distinct diel and seasonal soundscape patterns among habitats. We advocate collecting at least 120 hr of continuous recordings per site, and using a range of acoustic indices to categorize the soundscape, including the Acoustic Complexity Index, Acoustic Evenness Index, Acoustic Entropy Index and the Normalized Difference Soundscape Index. Differences among habitat types can be captured if multiple indices are used, and magnitude of variance is often more important than mean values. The workflow we provide will enable successful use of ecoacoustic techniques for environmental monitoring.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/2041-210x.13254

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 56 references

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bradfer-Lawrence T. Gardner N. Bunnefeld L. Bunnefeld N. Willis S. G. &Dent D. H.(2019).Dataset for "Guidelines for the use of acoustic indices for environmental research". Available from DataSTORRE http://hdl.handle.net/11667/132

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 319

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bradfer‐Lawrence, T., Gardner, N., Bunnefeld, L., Bunnefeld, N., Willis, S. G., & Dent, D. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Stirling (GB)
  • Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PA)
  • Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Bradfer‐Lawrence, Tom
ORCID
Venue
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-07-29
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
1796-1807
ISSN
2041-210X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/2041-210x.13254
OpenAlex
W2955571688
Cited by
319
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 5
FWCI
23.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Methods in Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • DataSTORRE - Stirling Online Repository for Research Data (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Noise Effects and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
ecoacoustics, acoustic indices, soundscape, biodiversity monitoring, habitat discrimination, acoustic complexity index, recording duration, Panama

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review