Cited by 80Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorWildlife Ecology and ConservationMarine animal studies overview

Utility of acoustic indices for ecological monitoring in complex sonic environments

Open access
Ross, Samuel R.P-J., Friedman, Nicholas R., Yoshimura, Masashi, Yoshida, Takuma, Donohue, Ian, Economo, Evan P.·2021·Ecological Indicators

Abstract

With the continued adoption of passive acoustic monitoring as a tool for rapid and high-resolution ecosystem monitoring, ecologists are increasingly making use of a suite of acoustic indices to summarise the sonic environment. Though these indices are often reported to well represent some aspect of the biology of an ecosystem, the degree to which they are confounded by various extraneous sonic conditions is largely unknown. We conducted an aural inventory across 23 field sites in Okinawa to identify the number of unique animal sounds present in recordings. Using these values of ‘measured richness’, we then examined how the performance of 11 commonly-used acoustic indices varied across a range of sonic conditions (including in the presence and absence of insect stridulations, audible wind or rain, and human-related sounds). Our analysis identified both well- and poor-performing acoustic indices, as well as those that were particularly sensitive to sonic conditions. Only two indices reflected measured richness across the full range of sonic conditions examined. A few indices were relatively insensitive to extraneous sonic conditions, but no index correlated with measured richness when masked by sound from broadband stridulating insects. Our results demonstrate considerable sensitivity of most commonly used acoustic indices to confounding sonic conditions, highlighting the challenges of working with large acoustic datasets collected in the field. We make practical recommendations for acoustic index use based on study design, with the aim of identifying the suite of acoustic indices with greatest utility as indicators for rapid biodiversity monitoring and management of the world’s natural soundscapes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107114

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ross, S. R. P.-J., Friedman, N. R., Yoshimura, M., Yoshida, T., Donohue, I., & Economo, E. P.
Affiliations
  • Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Ross, Samuel R.P-J.
Venue
Ecological Indicators
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
121
Pages
107114
ISSN
1470-160X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3105568371
Cited by
78
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecological Indicators (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17 K15178)
  • Irish Research Council (GOIPG/2018/3023)
  • Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (2020)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
acoustic indices, passive acoustic monitoring, anthropogenic noise, biodiversity monitoring, soundscape management, Okinawa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review