Cited by 23Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Mechanisms and Treatments

A validation of the pain interference index in adults with long-standing pain

Open access
Kemani, M. K., Zetterqvist, V., Kanstrup, M., Holmström, L., Wicksell, R. K.·2016·Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a major health problem and more knowledge is needed regarding the interference of pain on behaviors in different life domains. Clinically useful and statistically sound pain interference measures are highly important. Studies on youths have shown that the Pain Interference Index (PII) is a reliable and valid instrument that is sensitive to change following behavioral treatment. This measure may also have utility for adults, but no study has so far evaluated the statistical properties of the PII for long-standing pain in adults. METHODS: Data were collected from 239 consecutive adults with non-specific chronic pain referred to a tertiary pain clinic. We investigated the factor structure of items using a principal component analysis. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. The questionnaire's ability to predict levels of, e.g., disability was analyzed by means of regression analyses. RESULTS: Analyses illustrated the adequacy of a one-factor solution with six items. Cronbach's alpha (0.85) suggested a satisfactory internal consistency among items. The PII explained significant amounts of variance in pain disability, physical, and mental health-related quality of life and depression, suggesting concurrent criteria validity. CONCLUSION: The PII is a brief questionnaire with reliable and valid statistical properties to assess pain interference in adults. Other studies support the reliability and validity of PII for use with youths, and now the PII can be used to analyze the influence of pain on behaviors across age groups. Potentially, the PII can also be used as an outcome measure in clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aas.12599

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kemani, M. K., Zetterqvist, V., Kanstrup, M., Holmström, L., & Wicksell, R. K.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Kemani, M. K.
Venue
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-27
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
250-258
ISSN
  • 0001-5172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-6576
OpenAlex
W1888129392
Cited by
23
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kommunfullmäktige, Stockholms Stad
  • Karolinska Institutet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
chronic pain, pain interference, adults, psychometric validation, factor structure, internal consistency, pain-related disability, health-related quality of life, depression
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Principal Component Analysis, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review