Cited by 106

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sex differences in lifespan extension with acarbose and 17‐α estradiol: gonadal hormones underlie male‐specific improvements in glucose tolerance and mTORC 2 signaling

Garratt, Michael, Bower, Brian, Garcia, Gonzalo G., Miller, Richard A.·2017·Aging Cell

Abstract

Summary: Interventions that extend lifespan in mice can show substantial sexual dimorphism. Here, we show that male‐specific lifespan extension with two pharmacological treatments, acarbose ( ACA ) and 17‐α estradiol (17aE2), is associated, in males only, with increased insulin sensitivity and improved glucose tolerance. Females, which show either smaller ( ACA ) or no lifespan extension (17aE2), do not derive these metabolic benefits from drug treatment. We find that these male‐specific metabolic improvements are associated with enhanced hepatic mTORC 2 signaling, increased Akt activity, and phosphorylation of FOXO 1a – changes that might promote metabolic health and survival in males. By manipulating sex hormone levels through gonadectomy, we show that sex‐specific changes in these metabolic pathways are modulated, in opposite directions, by both male and female gonadal hormones: Castrated males show fewer metabolic responses to drug treatment than intact males, and only those that are also observed in intact females, while ovariectomized females show some responses similar to those seen in intact males. Our results demonstrate that sex‐specific metabolic benefits occur concordantly with sexual dimorphism in lifespan extension. These sex‐specific effects can be influenced by the presence of both male and female gonadal hormones, suggesting that gonadally derived hormones from both sexes may contribute to sexual dimorphism in responses to interventions that extend mouse lifespan.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acel.12656

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1530/jrf.0.0140113 · DOI
  2. 10.1159/000381472 · DOI
  3. 10.18632/oncotarget.2984 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.ghir.2004.02.005 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00199-5 · DOI
  6. 10.1371/journal.pone.0026891 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.lfs.2012.11.007 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/nyas.13302 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06388.x · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.06.003 · DOI
  11. 10.1210/en.2014-1690 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/0531-5565(76)90007-3 · DOI
  13. 10.1042/BJ20081668 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1111/acel.12489 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/gerona/glx010 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.genm.2009.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1155/2015/916585 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/acel.12170 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.009 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1126/science.1215135 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1096/fj.13-237743 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/acel.12256 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/B978-0-12-374271-1.00014-9 · DOI
  24. 10.1126/scisignal.aad8170 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/bies.201300021 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1111/acel.12194 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/acel.12575 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.01.026 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.beem.2013.05.016 · DOI
  30. 10.1152/ajpendo.00031.2014 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/acel.12590 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.trsl.2013.12.002 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/gerona/glv309 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1007/s00394-011-0266-4 · DOI
  35. 10.1371/journal.pone.0022640 · DOI
  36. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-19-08391.2002 · DOI
  37. 10.1210/en.2004-1616 · DOI
  38. 10.3389/fendo.2014.00241 · DOI
  39. 10.1124/mol.109.056705 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1111/acel.12145 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/gerona/glt056 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Garratt, M., Bower, B., Garcia, G. G., & Miller, R. A.
Affiliations
Department of Pathology University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor MI 48109 USA
Venue
Aging Cell
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-22
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
1256-1266
ISSN
  • 1474-9718
  • 1474-9726
Cited by
106
References
6
Language
en
Funders
  • Glenn Foundation for Medical Research
  • National Institutes of Health (AG024824, AG022303)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review