Cited by 377scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Writing and PublishingPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Using publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact

Open access
Carpenter, Christopher R., Cone, David C., Sarli, Cathy C.·2014·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

This article provides a broad overview of widely available measures of academic productivity and impact using publication data and highlights uses of these metrics for various purposes. Metrics based on publication data include measures such as number of publications, number of citations, the journal impact factor score, and the h-index, as well as emerging metrics based on document-level metrics. Publication metrics can be used for a variety of purposes for tenure and promotion, grant applications and renewal reports, benchmarking, recruiting efforts, and administrative purposes for departmental or university performance reports. The authors also highlight practical applications of measuring and reporting academic productivity and impact to emphasize and promote individual investigators, grant applications, or department output.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acem.12482

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number of publications over time is one of the most relevant factors as to how much scholars are interested in a specific topic, and is an indicator of the expansion of a field of research.

    “The number of publications over time, or the growth trend, is one of the most relevant factors as to how much scholars are interested in a specific topic, and is an indicator of the expansion of a field of research [44,45,46].”

    From Towards Green and Sustainable Healthcare: A Literature Review and Research Agenda for Green Leadership in the Healthcare Sector (2023) · cites this paper as [44]

    The 'Number of Publications' section (page not specified) treats publication counts within a time frame as a measure of an investigator’s productivity. The grant-proposal example also counts publications in a research area over five years to identify a literature gap. Neither passage says that a topic’s publication growth measures scholars’ interest or indicates expansion of the field. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [29]Alberts B Impact factor distortions Science 2013 340 787 23687012
  2. [39]Thomson-Reuters Thomson Reuters Research Analytics Unveils 2013 Release of Its Journal Citation Reports Accessed Jul 18, 2014 Available at: http://thomsonreuters.com/press-releases/062013/2013-journal-citation-reports

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carpenter, C. R., Cone, D. C., & Sarli, C. C.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
1160-1172
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W2088433402
Cited by
377
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
16.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000448)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
publication metrics, academic productivity, research impact, citation analysis, journal impact factor, h-index, tenure and promotion, grant applications, research benchmarking, academic recruitment
MeSH terms
Authorship, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Publishing, Bibliometrics, Peer Review, Research, Biomedical Research, Journal Impact Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review