Cited by 95Gun Ownership and Violence ResearchInjury Epidemiology and PreventionTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

Individual and Neighborhood Characteristics of Children Seeking Emergency Department Care for Firearm Injuries Within the PECARN Network

Open access
Carter, Patrick M., Cook, Lawrence J., Macy, Michelle L., Zonfrillo, Mark R., Stanley, Rachel M., Chamberlain, James M., Fein, Joel A., Alpern, Elizabeth R. +2 more·2017·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to describe the characteristics of children seeking emergency care for firearm injuries within the PECARN network and assess the influence of both individual and neighborhood factors on firearm‐related injury risk. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter cross‐sectional analysis of children (<19 years old) presenting to 16 pediatric ED s (2004–2008). ICD‐9‐CM E‐codes were used to identify and categorize firearm injuries by mechanism/intent. Neighborhood variables were derived from home address data. Multivariable analysis examined the influence of individual and neighborhood factors on firearm‐related injuries compared to nonfirearm ED visits. Injury recidivism was assessed. Results: A total of 1,758 pediatric ED visits for firearm‐related injuries were analyzed. Assault (51.4%, n = 904) and unintentional injury (33.2%, n = 584) were the most common injury mechanisms. Among children with firearm injuries, 68.3% were older adolescents (15–19 years old), 82.3% were male, 68.2% were African American, and 76.3% received public insurance/were uninsured. Extremity injuries were most common (75.9%), with 20% sustaining injuries to multiple body regions, 48.1% requiring admission and 1% ED mortality. Multivariable analysis identified firearm injury risk factors, including adolescent age (p < 0.001), male sex (p < 0.001), non‐Caucasian race/ethnicity (p < 0.001), public payer/uninsured status (p < 0.001), and higher levels of neighborhood disadvantage (p < 0.001). Among children with firearm injuries, 12‐month ED recidivism for any reason was 22.4%, with < 1% returning for another firearm injury. Conclusion: Among children receiving ED treatment within the PECARN network, there are distinct demographic and neighborhood factors associated with firearm injuries. Among younger children (<10 years old), unintentional injuries predominate, while assault‐type injuries were most common among older adolescents. Overall, among this PECARN patient population, male adolescents living in neighborhoods characterized by high levels of concentrated disadvantage had an elevated risk for firearm injury. Public health efforts should focus on developing and implementing initiatives addressing risk factors at both the individual and the community level, including ED‐based interventions to reduce the risk for firearm injuries among high‐risk pediatric populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acem.13200

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The comprehensive and representative sample may account for the higher recurrent injury observed in this study compared to others reporting recurrent firearm injury ranging from one to 10% across a variety of clinical and geographic settings and time periods.

    “This may account for the higher recurrent injury observed in this study compared to others reporting recurrent firearm injury ranging from one to 10% across a variety of clinical and geographic settings and time periods.15,18,33-44”

    From Incidence of and Factors Associated With Recurrent Firearm Injury Among Patients Presenting to St. Louis Trauma Centers, 2010 to 2019 (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two proxy measures commonly used in the existing literature are ED visits and time between firearm injury encounters.

    “Two proxy measures commonly used in the existing body of literature are (1) ED visits and (2) time between firearm injury encounters.2,4-9”

    From Machine learning classification of new firearm injury encounters in the St Louis region: 2010-2020 (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Methods (Data Analysis; page unavailable) identify repeat ED visits within 12 months of an index firearm injury, and the Results (Emergency Department Outcomes and Recidivism; page unavailable) report subsequent visits and firearm injuries. This supports ED visits as a measure, but the paper does not report time between separate firearm injury encounters as a measured interval; its 12-month follow-up window is not that measure. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The time-based approach is most often applied to studies of firearm injury recurrence, with days since prior injury ranging from 1 to 90 days depending on the study.

    “The time-based approach is most often applied to studies of firearm injury recurrence, with days since prior injury ranging from 1 to 90 days, depending on the study [7][8][9]”

    From Machine learning classification of new firearm injury encounters in the St Louis region: 2010-2020 (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Methods (Data Analysis; page unavailable) use a time window to assess firearm-injury recidivism, supporting this paper as an example of a time-based approach. But the window is 12 months before and after the index visit, with returns within 72 hours excluded—not a 1-to-90-day window. This paper also does not establish how often the approach is used across studies. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. [1]Richardson EG Hemenway D Homicide, suicide, and unintentional firearm fatality: comparing the United States with other high-income countries, 2003 Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2011 70 238 43 20571454
  2. [2]Institute of Medicine of the National Academies Priorities for research to reduce the threat of firearm-related violence 2013 27046170
  3. [5]Karch DL Dahlberg LL Patel N Surveillance for violent deaths—National violent death reporting system, 16 States, 2007 MMWR Surveill Summ 2010 59 1 50 20467415
  4. [6]Martin CA Unni P Landman MP Race disparities in firearm injuries and outcomes among Tennessee children Journal of pediatric surgery 2012 47 1196 203 22703793
  5. [7]Pressley JC Barlow B Kendig T Paneth-Pollak R Twenty-year trends in fatal injuries to very young children: the persistence of racial disparities Pediatrics 2007 119 e875 84 17403830
  6. [8]DiScala C Sege R Outcomes in children and young adults who are hospitalized for firearms-related injuries Pediatrics 2004 113 1306 12 15121946
  7. [10]Cunningham RM Ranney M Newton M Woodhull W Zimmerman M Walton MA Characteristics of youth seeking emergency care for assault injuries Pediatrics 2014 133 e96 e105 24323994 PMC3876183
  8. [11]Sege RD Kharasch S Perron C Pediatric violence-related injuries in Boston - Results of a city-wide emergency department surveillance program Arch Pediat Adol Med 2002 156 73 6 11772194
  9. [12]Cheng TL Wright JL Fields CB Violent injuries among adolescents: declining morbidity and mortality in an urban population AnnEmergMed 2001 37 292 300 11223766
  10. [13]Cunningham RM Murray R Walton MA Prevalence of past year assault among inner-city Emergency Department patients Ann Emerg Med 2009 53 814 23 19282061 PMC2981596
  11. [14]Leventhal JM Gaither JR Sege R Hospitalizations due to firearm injuries in children and adolescents Pediatrics 2014 133 219 25 24470651
  12. [15]Rowhani-Rahbar A Zatzick D Wang J Firearm-related hospitalization and risk for subsequent violent injury, death, or crime perpetration: a cohort study Annals of Internal Medicine 2015 162 492 500 25706337
  13. [16]Newgard CD Kuppermann N Holmes JF Gunshot injuries in children served by emergency services Pediatrics 2013 132 862 70 24127481 PMC3813400
  14. [17]Srinivasan S Mannix R Lee LK Epidemiology of pediatric firearm injuries in the USA, 2001–2010 Archives of Disease in Childhood 2014 99 331 5 24336468
  15. [18]Alpern ER Stanley RM Gorelick MH Epidemiology of a pediatric emergency medicine research network: the PECARN Core Data Project PediatrEmergCare 2006 22 689 99 17047467
  16. [20]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommended framework for presenting injury mortality data MMWR: Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report Recommendations and reports/Centers for Disease Control 1997 46 1 30 9301976
  17. [23]Hall SA Kaufman JS Ricketts TC Defining urban and rural areas in US epidemiologic studies Journal of Urban Health 2006 83 162 75 16736366 PMC2527174
  18. [24]Goldstick JE Lipton RI Carter P The effect of neighborhood context on the relationship between substance misuse and weapons aggression in urban adolescents seeking ED care Substance Use & Misuse 2015 50 674 84 25607807 PMC4646060
  19. [25]Sampson RJ Raudenbush SW Earls F Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy Science 1997 277 918 24 9252316
  20. [26]Baker SP O’Neill B Haddon W Jr Long WB The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care J Trauma 1974 14 187 96 4814394
  21. [27]MacKenzie EJ Steinwachs DM Shankar B Classifying trauma severity based on hospital discharge diagnoses: validation of an ICD-9CM to AIS-85 conversion table Medical Care 1989 27 412 22 2649755
  22. [28]Durbin DR Localio AR MacKenzie EJ Validation of the ICD/AIS MAP for pediatric use Injury Prevention 2001 7 96 9 11428572 PMC1730713
  23. [31]Haukoos JS Newgard CD Advanced statistics: missing data in clinical research—part 1: an introduction and conceptual framework AcadEmergMed 2007 14 662 8 17538078
  24. [32]Newgard CD Haukoos JS Advanced statistics: missing data in clinical research—part 2: multiple imputation AcadEmergMed 2007 14 669 78 17595237
  25. [33]Hendry PL Suen A Kalynych CJ Lott M Paul J Smotherman C A 6-year retrospective review of pediatric firearm injuries: Do patients< 14 years of age differ from those 15–18 years of age? Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2014 77 S41 S5 25153054
  26. [34]Hepburn L Miller M Azrael D Hemenway D The US gun stock: results from the 2004 national firearms survey Injury Prevention 2007 13 15 9 17296683 PMC2610545
  27. [35]Schuster MA Franke TM Bastian AM Sor S Halfon N Firearm storage patterns in US homes with children AmJPublic Health 2000 90 588 PMC1446208 10754974
  28. [36]Naureckas SM Galanter C Naureckas ET Donovan M Christoffel KK Children’s and women’s ability to fire handguns Arch Pediat Adol Med 1995 149 1318 22 7489067
  29. [37]Wintemute GJ Teret SP Kraus JF Wright MA Bradfield G When children shoot children: 88 unintended deaths in California JAMA 1987 257 3107 9 3586229
  30. [38]Eber GB Annest JL Mercy JA Ryan GW Nonfatal and fatal firearm-related injuries among children aged 14 years and younger: United States, 1993–2000 Pediatrics 2004 113 1686 92 15173492
  31. [39]Snyder AK Chen LE Foglia RP Dillon PA Minkes RK An analysis of pediatric gunshot wounds treated at a level I pediatric trauma center Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2003 54 1102 6 12813329
  32. [40]Elnour AA Harrison J Lethality of suicide methods Injury Prevention 2008 14 39 45 18245314
  33. [41]Grossman DC Stafford HA Koepsell TD Hill R Retzer KD Jones W Improving firearm storage in Alaska native villages: a randomized trial of household gun cabinets AmJPublic Health 2012 102 S291 S7 PMC3477912 22401514
  34. [42]Barkin SL Finch SA Ip EH Is office-based counseling about media use, timeouts, and firearm storage effective? Results from a cluster-randomized, controlled trial Pediatrics 2008 122 e15 e25 18595960 PMC4486046
  35. [43]McGee KS Coyne-Beasley T Johnson RM Review of evaluations of educational approaches to promote safe storage of firearms Injury Prevention 2003 9 108 11 12810734 PMC1730973
  36. [44]Albright TL Burge SK Improving firearm storage habits: impact of brief office counseling by family physicians The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 2003 16 40 6 12583649
  37. [45]Weinberger SE Lawrence HC III Henley DE Alden ER Hoyt DB Legislative interference with the patient–physician relationship New England Journal of Medicine 2012 367 1557 9 23075183
  38. [46]Hepburn L Azrael D Miller M Hemenway D The effect of child access prevention laws on unintentional child firearm fatalities, 1979–2000 Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2006 61 423 8 16917460
  39. [47]Becher EC Christakis NA Firearm injury prevention counseling: are we missing the mark? Pediatrics 1999 104 530 5 10469781
  40. [48]Chapman S Alpers P Agho K Jones M Australia’s 1996 gun law reforms: faster falls in firearm deaths, firearm suicides, and a decade without mass shootings Injury Prevention 2006 12 365 72 17170183 PMC2704353
  41. [49]Webster DW Vernick JS Zeoli AM Manganello JA Association between youth-focused firearm laws and youth suicides Jama 2004 292 594 601 15292085
  42. [50]Blumstein A Youth, guns, and violent crime The future of children 2002 39 53 12194611
  43. [51]Carter PM Walton MA Newton MF Firearm possession among adolescents presenting to an urban Emergency Department for assault Pediatrics 2013 132 213 21 23837181 PMC3727673
  44. [52]Office of the Surgeon General Youth violence: A report of the Surgeon General Rockville, MD US Department of Health and Human Services 2001 20669522
  45. [53]Cunningham R Knox L Fein J Before and after the trauma bay: the prevention of violent injury among youth Ann Emerg Med 2009 53 490 500 19162376
  46. [54]Cunningham RM Carter PM Ranney M Violent reinjury and mortality among youth seeking emergency department care for assault-related injury: a 2-year prospective cohort study JAMA pediatrics 2015 169 63 70 25365147 PMC4306452
  47. [57]Walton MA Chermack ST Shope JT Effects of a brief intervention for reducing violence and alcohol misuse among adolescents: a randomized controlled trial JAMA 2010 304 527 35 20682932 PMC3560393
  48. [58]Cunningham RM Chermack S Zimmerman MA Brief Motivational Interviewing Intervention for Peer Violence and Alcohol Use in Teens: One Year Follow-up Pediatrics 2012 129 1083 90 22614776 PMC4074654
  49. [61]Arslan H Subasi M Kesemenli C Kapukaya A Necmioğlu S Kayıkçı C Problem fractures associated with gunshot wounds in children Injury 2002 33 743 9 12379381
  50. [62]van der Heijden GJ Donders ART Stijnen T Moons KG Imputation of missing values is superior to complete case analysis and the missing-indicator method in multivariable diagnostic research: a clinical example Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2006 59 1102 9 16980151
  51. [63]Crawford SL Tennstedt SL McKinlay JB A comparison of analytic methods for non-random missingness of outcome data Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1995 48 209 19 7869067
  52. [64]Joseph L Bélisle P Tamim H Sampalis JS Selection bias found in interpreting analyses with missing data for the prehospital index for trauma Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2004 57 147 53 15125624
  53. [65]Newgard CD The validity of using multiple imputation for missing out-of-hospital data in a state trauma registry AcadEmergMed 2006 13 314 24 16495420

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carter, P. M., Cook, L. J., Macy, M. L., Zonfrillo, M. R., Stanley, R. M., Chamberlain, J. M., Fein, J. A., Alpern, E. R., Cunningham, R. M., & the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN)
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
  • Children's National (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Carter, Patrick M.
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-29
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
803-813
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W2605757868
Cited by
95
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Resources and Services Administration
  • Maternal and Child Health Bureau
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
children, adolescents, emergency department visits, neighborhood disadvantage, concentrated disadvantage, assault injuries, unintentional firearm injury, injury risk factors, uninsured status, racial and ethnic disparities, community-based intervention, injury prevention, extremity injuries, emergency department mortality, hospitalization, gun violence prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Black or African American, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emergency Service, Hospital, Emergency Treatment, Female, Firearms, Humans, Male, Residence Characteristics, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Wounds, Gunshot

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review