Cited by 174Gun Ownership and Violence ResearchCrime Patterns and InterventionsSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Firearm Violence Among High-Risk Emergency Department Youth After an Assault Injury

Open access
Carter, Patrick M., Walton, Maureen A., Roehler, Douglas R., Goldstick, Jason, Zimmerman, Marc A., Blow, Frederic C., Cunningham, Rebecca M.·2015·Pediatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk for firearm violence among high-risk youth after treatment for an assault is unknown. METHODS: In this 2-year prospective cohort study, data were analyzed from a consecutive sample of 14- to 24-year-olds with drug use in the past 6 months seeking assault-injury care (AIG) at an urban level 1 emergency department (ED) compared with a proportionally sampled comparison group (CG) of drug-using nonassaulted youth. Validated measures were administered at baseline and follow-up (6, 12, 18, 24 months). RESULTS: A total of 349 AIG and 250 CG youth were followed for 24 months. During the follow-up period, 59% of the AIG reported firearm violence, a 40% higher risk than was observed among the CG (59.0% vs. 42.5%; relative risk [RR] = 1.39). Among those reporting firearm violence, 31.7% reported aggression, and 96.4% reported victimization, including 19 firearm injuries requiring medical care and 2 homicides. The majority with firearm violence (63.5%) reported at least 1 event within the first 6 months. Poisson regression identified baseline predictors of firearm violence, including male gender (RR = 1.51), African American race (RR = 1.26), assault-injury (RR = 1.35), firearm possession (RR = 1.23), attitudes favoring retaliation (RR = 1.03), posttraumatic stress disorder (RR = 1.39), and a drug use disorder (RR = 1.22). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk youth presenting to urban EDs for assault have elevated rates of subsequent firearm violence. Interventions at an index visit addressing substance use, mental health needs, retaliatory attitudes, and firearm possession may help decrease firearm violence among urban youth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2014-3572

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The comprehensive and representative sample may account for the higher recurrent injury observed in this study compared to others reporting recurrent firearm injury ranging from one to 10% across a variety of clinical and geographic settings and time periods.

    “This may account for the higher recurrent injury observed in this study compared to others reporting recurrent firearm injury ranging from one to 10% across a variety of clinical and geographic settings and time periods.15,18,33-44”

    From Incidence of and Factors Associated With Recurrent Firearm Injury Among Patients Presenting to St. Louis Trauma Centers, 2010 to 2019 (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [9]Hemenway D, Miller M. Public health approach to the prevention of gun violence. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(21):2033–2035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [11]Weiner J, Wiebe DJ, Richmond TS, et al. Reducing firearm violence: a research agenda. Inj Prev. 2007;13(2):80–84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [29]Straus MA. Conflict Tactics Scales. In: Jackson NA, ed. Encyclopedia of Domestic Violence. New York, NY: Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group; 2007:824 [Google Scholar]
  4. [31]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ICD-9-CM: International Classification of Diseases Ninth revision, Clinical Modification. Sixth Ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2009 [Google Scholar]
  5. [41]Sheley JF, Wright JD. Tulane University National Youth Study. New Orleans, LA: Tulane University; 1995 [Google Scholar]
  6. [44]Hill HM, Noblin V. Children’s Perceptions of Environmental Violence. Washington, DC: Howard University; 1991 [Google Scholar]
  7. [63]Duggan M. More Guns, More Crime. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2000 [Google Scholar]
  8. [79]Harrison LD, Martin SS, Enev T, Harrington D. Comparing Drug Testing and Self-Report of Drug Use Among Youths and Young Adults in the General Population (Department of Health and Human Services Publication No. SMA 07-4249, Methodology Series M-7). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies; 2007 [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carter, P. M., Walton, M. A., Roehler, D. R., Goldstick, J., Zimmerman, M. A., Blow, F. C., & Cunningham, R. M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2015-05-01
Volume
135
Issue
5
Pages
805-815
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2162518069
Cited by
174
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Michigan
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01CE002698, 1R49CE002099, R49CE002099)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01 024646)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (T32AA007477)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA024646)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
gun violence, assault injuries, at-risk youth, drug use, emergency department care, post-traumatic stress disorder, firearm possession, victimization, aggression, homicide, urban youth, substance use disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Violence, Wounds, Gunshot, Cohort Studies, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review