Cited by 379Emergency and Acute Care StudiesTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesEmergency Medicine Education and Research

Why Do People Choose Emergency and Urgent Care Services? A Rapid Review Utilizing a Systematic Literature Search and Narrative Synthesis

Open access
Coster, Joanne E., Turner, Janette K., Bradbury, Daniel, Cantrell, Anna·2017·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: Rising demand for emergency and urgent care services is well documented, as are the consequences, for example, emergency department ( ED ) crowding, increased costs, pressure on services, and waiting times. Multiple factors have been suggested to explain why demand is increasing, including an aging population, rising number of people with multiple chronic conditions, and behavioral changes relating to how people choose to access health services. The aim of this systematic mapping review was to bring together published research from urgent and emergency care settings to identify drivers that underpin patient decisions to access urgent and emergency care. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted across Medline (via Ovid SP ), EMBASE (via Ovid), The Cochrane Library (via Wiley Online Library), Web of Science (via the Web of Knowledge), and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature ( CINAHL ; via EBSCO host). Peer‐reviewed studies written in English that reported reasons for accessing or choosing emergency or urgent care services and were published between 1995 and 2016 were included. Data were extracted and reasons for choosing emergency and urgent care were identified and mapped. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes and findings were reported qualitatively using framework‐based narrative synthesis. Results: Thirty‐eight studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were set in the United Kingdom (39.4%) or the United States (34.2%) and reported results relating to ED (68.4%). Thirty‐nine percent of studies utilized qualitative or mixed research designs. Our thematic analysis identified six broad themes that summarized reasons why patients chose to access ED or urgent care. These were access to and confidence in primary care; perceived urgency, anxiety, and the value of reassurance from emergency‐based services; views of family, friends, or healthcare professionals; convenience (location, not having to make appointment, and opening hours); individual patient factors (e.g., cost); and perceived need for emergency medical services or hospital care, treatment, or investigations. Conclusions: We identified six distinct reasons explaining why patients choose to access emergency and urgent care services: limited access to or confidence in primary care; patient perceived urgency; convenience; views of family, friends, or other health professionals; and a belief that their condition required the resources and facilities offered by a particular healthcare provider. There is a need to examine demand from a whole system perspective to gain better understanding of demand for different parts of the emergency and urgent care system and the characteristics of patients within each sector.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acem.13220

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [10]McCallion T. NASEMSO Survey Provides Snapshot of EMS Industry. 2011. Available at: http://www.jems.com/articles/2011/11/nasemso-survey-provides-snapshot-ems-ind.html Accessed Feb 8, 2016. 22269690
  2. [13]Boyle P, Pineeault R, Roberge D. Assessing Quebecs's multicomponent program to reduce emergency room overcrowding. Can Public Policy 1992; 18: 189– 202.
  3. [76]Citizens Advice. Younger Adults More Likely to Turn to Walk‐in Centres and A&E. 2014. Available at: https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/about-us/how-citizens-advice-works/media/press-releases/younger-adults-more-likely-to-turn-to-walk-in-centres-and-a-amp-e/ Accessed Oct 21, 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coster, J. E., Turner, J. K., Bradbury, D., & Cantrell, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Coster, Joanne E.
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-19
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
1137-1149
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W2613680655
Cited by
379
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research (13/05/12)
  • Health Services and Delivery Research Programme
  • University of Sheffield
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency Medicine Education and Research
Keywords
emergency department utilization, urgent care, patient help-seeking behavior, primary care access, perceived urgency, convenience, health care costs, emergency department overcrowding, health care demand
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care, Attitude to Health, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Emergencies, Emergency Service, Hospital, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Primary Health Care, Qualitative Research, Patient Preference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review