Cited by 81Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyElectronic Health Records Systems

Acceptability, Usability, and Effectiveness: A Qualitative Study Evaluating a Pediatric Telemedicine Program

Open access
Sauers‐Ford, Hadley S., Hamline, Michelle Y., Gosdin, Melissa M., Kair, Laura R., Weinberg, Gary M., Marcin, James P., Rosenthal, Jennifer L.·2019·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pediatric emergency telemedicine consultations have been shown to provide support to community emergency departments treating critically ill pediatric patients. However, despite the recognized value of telemedicine, adoption has been slow. To determine why clinicians frequently do not use telemedicine when it is available for pediatric patients, as well as to learn how to improve telemedicine programs, we conducted a qualitative study using stakeholder interviews. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using grounded theory methodology, with in-depth interviews of referring and accepting physicians and referring, transport, and transfer center nurses. We analyzed data iteratively and adapted the interview guide based on early interviews. We solicited feedback from the participants on the conceptual model. RESULTS: Sixteen interviews were conducted; all respondents had been involved in a telemedicine consultation at least five times, with some having used telemedicine more than 30 times. Analysis resulted in three themes: 1) recognizing and addressing telemedicine biases are central to gaining buy-in; 2) as technology advances, telemedicine processes need to adapt accordingly; and 3) telemedicine increases collaboration among health care providers and patients/families in the patient care process. CONCLUSIONS: To improve patient care through increased use of telemedicine for pediatric emergency consultations, processes need to be modified to address provider biases and end-user concerns. Processes should be adapted to allow users to utilize a variety of technologies (including smartphones) and to enable more users, such as nurses, to participate. Finally, telemedicine can be used to improve the patient and family experience by including them in consultations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acem.13763

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]Richards L MJ. Readme First for an Introduction to Qualitative Methods 2nd ed Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 2007.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sauers‐Ford, H. S., Hamline, M. Y., Gosdin, M. M., Kair, L. R., Weinberg, G. M., Marcin, J. P., & Rosenthal, J. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Sauers‐Ford, Hadley S.
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-02
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1022-1033
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W2936812174
Cited by
81
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1 TR001860, KL2 TR001859)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
pediatric telemedicine, telehealth adoption, stakeholder perspectives, interhospital collaboration, patient and family involvement, technology acceptance, community emergency departments
MeSH terms
Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Child, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Referral and Consultation, Program Evaluation, Telemedicine, Qualitative Research, Grounded Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review