Cited by 59Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesTraffic and Road SafetyEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Emergency department-based brief intervention to reduce risky driving and hazardous/harmful drinking in young adults: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Sommers, Marilyn S., Lyons, Michael S., Fargo, Jamison D., Sommers, Benjamin D., McDonald, Catherine C., Shope, Jean T., Fleming, Michael F.·2013·Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

Background: Risky driving and hazardous drinking are associated with significant human and economic costs. Brief interventions for more than one risky behavior have the potential to reduce health‐compromising behaviors in populations with multiple risk‐taking behaviors such as young adults. Emergency department (ED) visits provide a window of opportunity for interventions meant to reduce both risky driving and hazardous drinking. Methods: We determined the efficacy of a Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) protocol addressing risky driving and hazardous drinking. We used a randomized controlled trial design with follow‐ups through 12 months. ED patients aged 18 to 44 who screened positive for both behaviors (n = 476) were randomized to brief intervention (BIG), contact control (CCG), or no‐contact control (NCG) groups. The BIG (n = 150) received a 20‐minute assessment and two 20‐minute interventions. The CCG (n = 162) received a 20‐minute assessment at baseline and no intervention. The NCG (n = 164) were asked for contact information at baseline and had no assessment or intervention. Outcomes at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were self‐reported driving behaviors and alcohol consumption. Results: Outcomes were significantly lower in BIG compared with CCG through 6 or 9 months, but not at 12 months: Safety belt use at 3 months (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08 to 0.65); 6 months (AOR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.42); and 9 months (AOR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.56); binge drinking at 3 months (adjusted rate ratio [ARR] 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.97) and 6 months (ARR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.97); and ≥5 standard drinks/d at 3 months (AOR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.91) and 6 months (AOR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.98). No substantial differences were observed between BIG and NCG at 12 months. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that SBIRT reduced risky driving and hazardous drinking in young adults, but its effects did not persist after 9 months. Future research should explore methods for extending the intervention effect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acer.12142

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sommers, M. S., Lyons, M. S., Fargo, J. D., Sommers, B. D., McDonald, C. C., Shope, J. T., & Fleming, M. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Utah State University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Sommers, Marilyn S.
Venue
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-06-26
Volume
37
Issue
10
Pages
1753-1762
ISSN
  • 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0277
OpenAlex
W2108277304
Cited by
59
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R49/CCR-523225)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K24AA015390)
  • National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
risky driving behavior, hazardous drinking, young adults, emergency department, brief intervention, SBIRT, screening and brief intervention, binge drinking, alcohol consumption, seat belt use, drunk driving, multiple risk behaviors, alcohol-related traffic accidents, intervention efficacy, follow-up retention, referral to treatment, harm reduction, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Automobile Driving, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Risk-Taking, Young Adult, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review