Cited by 45Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHomelessness and Social IssuesAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT): 12-month outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial in a Polish emergency department

Open access
Cherpitel, Cheryl J., Korcha, Rachael A., Moskalewicz, Jacek, Swiatkiewicz, Grazyna, Ye, Yu, Bond, Jason·2010·Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

Background: A randomized controlled trial of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) among at‐risk (based on average number of drinks per week and drinks per drinking day) and dependent drinkers was conducted in an emergency department (ED) among 446 patients 18 and older in Sosnowiec, Poland. Methods: Patients were recruited over a 23‐week period (4:00 pm to 12:00 midnight) and randomized to 1 of 3 conditions: screened‐only (n = 147), assessed (n = 152), and intervention (n = 147). Patients in the assessed and intervention conditions were blindly reassessed via a telephone interview at 3 months, and all 3 groups were assessed at 12 months (screened‐only = 92, assessed = 99, and intervention = 87). Results: No difference was found across the 3 conditions in at‐risk drinking at 12 months, as the primary outcome variable, or in decrease in the number of drinks per drinking day, with all 3 groups showing a significant reduction in both. Significant declines between baseline and 12 months in secondary outcomes of the RAPS4, number of drinking days per week, and the maximum number of drinks on an occasion were seen only for the intervention condition, and in negative consequences for both the assessment and intervention conditions. Conclusions: Data suggest that improvements in drinking outcomes found in the assessment condition were not because of assessment reactivity, with both the screened and intervention conditions demonstrating greater (although nonsignificant) improvement than the assessed condition. Only those in the intervention condition showed significant improvement in all outcome variables from baseline to 12‐month follow‐up. Although group by time interaction effects were not found to be significant, these findings suggest that declines in drinking measures for those receiving a brief intervention can be maintained at long‐term follow‐up.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01281.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Breslin RW Lonner WJ Berry JW 1986 The wording and translation of research instruments Field methods in cross-cultural research 8 137 165 SAGE Publications Newbury Park, CA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cherpitel, C. J., Korcha, R. A., Moskalewicz, J., Swiatkiewicz, G., Ye, Y., & Bond, J.
Affiliations
Alcohol Research Group (US)
Corresponding author
Cherpitel, Cheryl J.
Venue
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-26
Volume
34
Issue
11
Pages
1922-1928
ISSN
  • 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0277
OpenAlex
W1498603615
Cited by
45
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R21AA016081)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
SBIRT, alcoholism, emergency department patients, hazardous drinking, brief intervention, long-term outcomes, alcohol-related consequences, alcohol screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Dropouts, Poland, Referral and Consultation, Sex Factors, Trauma Centers, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review