Cited by 109Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Treatment and AccessBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Avoidable mortality in people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder in E ngland

Hoang, U., Goldacre, M. J., Stewart, R.·2013·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective: To quantify the extent of ‘avoidable mortality’ in those with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and to quantify the effect a reduction in these might have on the mortality gap associated with severe mental illness. Method: A cohort was studied of people aged <75 years, discharged from inpatient care with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder in 2006–2007, and followed up for 365 days. Standardised mortality ratios (SMR s) were calculated followed by hypothetical SMR s, estimating the residual mortality gap if ‘avoidable’ causes and suicide in the cohorts had occurred at the same level as those in the general population. Results: Avoidable deaths comprised 60.2% and 59.2% of all deaths in the schizophrenia and bipolar disorder cohorts respectively. All‐cause SMR s were 4.23 (95% CI 3.85–4.60) and 2.60 (2.21–3.00) respectively. After discounting the excess attributable to avoidable causes and suicide, the SMR s fell to 2.38 (2.09–2.66) and 1.66 (1.35–1.98) respectively. Conclusion: Bringing mortality from avoidable causes and suicide down to general population levels would reduce the overall mortality excess in severe mental illness substantially, by about 50%, but would not eliminate it. Other underlying factors beyond those conventionally considered as ‘avoidable’ need further research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acps.12045

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoang, U., Goldacre, M. J., & Stewart, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Hoang, U.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-09
Volume
127
Issue
3
Pages
195-201
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2116643778
Cited by
109
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
avoidable mortality, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, severe mental illness, mortality gap, suicide, standardized mortality ratio, older adults, hospital discharge, excess mortality
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Bipolar Disorder, Cause of Death, England, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Schizophrenia, Suicide, Cohort Studies, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review