Cited by 54Mental Health Treatment and AccessSchizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and Psychiatry

Clinical and demographic correlates of stigma in first-episode psychosis: the impact of duration of untreated psychosis

Open access
Mueser, K. T., DeTore, N. R., Kredlow, M. A., Bourgeois, M. L., Penn, D. L., Hintz, K.·2020·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationships between perceived stigma and duration of untreated psychosis (DUP), demographic characteristics, and clinical and psychosocial functioning in persons with a first episode of psychosis (FEP). METHOD: A total of 399 participants with FEP presenting for treatment at 34 sites in 21 states throughout the United States were evaluated using standardized instruments to assess diagnosis, symptoms, psychosocial functioning, perceived stigma, wellbeing, and subjective recovery. RESULTS: Perceived stigma was correlated with a range of demographic and clinical variables, including DUP, symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and subjective experience. After controlling for symptom severity, perceived stigma was related to longer DUP, schizoaffective disorder diagnosis, more severe depression, and lower wellbeing and recovery. The associations between stigma and depression, wellbeing, and recovery were stronger in individuals with long than short DUP, suggesting the effects of stigma on psychological functioning may be cumulative over the period of untreated psychosis. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that independent of symptom severity, perceived stigma may contribute to delay in seeking treatment for FEP, and this delay may amplify the deleterious effects of stigma on psychological functioning. The results point to the importance of reducing DUP and validating interventions targeting the psychological effects of stigma in people with FEP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acps.13102

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1963.
  2. [4]Yanos PT. Written Off: Mental Health Stigma and the Loss of Human Potential. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2018.
  3. [29]First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis-I Disorders - Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, Version 2.0). New York: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute; 1996.
  4. [34]Young SL, Bullock WA. Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM). In: Campbell-Orde T, Chamberlin J, Carpenter J, Leff HS, eds. Measuring the Promise: A Compendium of Recovery Measures. Vol II Cambridge, MA: Evaluation Center @ Human Services Research Institute; 2005: 36– 41.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mueser, K. T., DeTore, N. R., Kredlow, M. A., Bourgeois, M. L., Penn, D. L., & Hintz, K.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Mueser, K. T.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-10-11
Volume
141
Issue
2
Pages
157-166
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2976367414
Cited by
54
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (90AR5018)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (HHSN271200900019C)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
perceived stigma, first-episode psychosis, duration of untreated psychosis, treatment delay, psychosocial functioning, well-being, subjective recovery, depression, schizoaffective disorder, symptom severity, demographic correlates
MeSH terms
Mental Health Recovery, Psychosocial Functioning, Adolescent, Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Severity of Illness Index, United States, Young Adult, Social Stigma, Time-to-Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review