Cited by 20Alcohol Consumption and Health EffectsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Prevalence of alcohol‐related pathologies at autopsy: E stonian F orensic S tudy of A lcohol and P remature D eath

Open access
Tuusov, Jana, Lang, Katrin, Väli, Marika, Pärna, Kersti, Tõnisson, Mailis, Ringmets, Inge, McKee, Martin, Helander, Anders +1 more·2014·Addiction

Abstract

AIMS: Alcohol can induce diverse serious pathologies, yet this complexity may be obscured when alcohol-related deaths are classified according to a single underlying cause. We sought to quantify this issue and its implications for analysing mortality data. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study included 554 men aged 25-54 in Estonia undergoing forensic autopsy in 2008-09. MEASUREMENTS: Potentially alcohol-related pathologies were identified following macroscopic and histological examination. Alcohol biomarkers levels were determined. For a subset (26%), drinking behaviour was provided by next-of-kin. The Estonian Statistics Office provided underlying cause of death. FINDINGS: Most deaths (75%) showed evidence of potentially alcohol-related pathologies, and 32% had pathologies in two or more organs. The liver was most commonly affected [60.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 56.3-64.6] followed by the lungs (18.6%, 95% CI = 15.4-22.1), stomach (17.5%, 95% CI = 14.4-20.9), pancreas (14.1%, 95% CI = 11.3-17.3), heart (4.9%, 95% CI = 3.2-7.0) and oesophagus (1.4%, 95% CI = 0.6-2.8). Only a minority with liver pathology had a second pathology. The number of pathologies correlated with alcohol biomarkers (phosphatidylethanol, gamma-glytamyl transpeptidase in blood, ethylglucuronide, ethylsulphate in urine). Despite the high prevalence of liver pathology, few deaths had alcoholic liver disease specified as the underlying cause. CONCLUSION: The majority of 554 men aged 25-54 undergoing forensic autopsy in Estonia in 2008-09 showed evidence of alcohol-related pathology. However, the recording of deaths by underlying cause failed to capture the scale and nature of alcohol-induced pathologies found.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.12695

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This under-reporting of alcoholic liver cirrhosis has persisted in later studies.

    “This under‐reporting of alcoholic liver cirrhosis has persisted in later studies 294, 295, 296; this seems to be the case for all disease categories fully attributable to alcohol use 296, 297 including, but not limited to, the disclosure of alcohol use disorders.”
  • This under-reporting seems to be the case for all disease categories fully attributable to alcohol use including, but not limited to, the disclosure of alcohol use disorders.

    “this seems to be the case for all disease categories fully attributable to alcohol use 296, 297 including, but not limited to, the disclosure of alcohol use disorders.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuusov, J., Lang, K., Väli, M., Pärna, K., Tõnisson, M., Ringmets, I., McKee, M., Helander, A., & Leon, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Tartu (EE)
  • Tartu University Hospital (EE)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Tuusov, Jana
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-28
Volume
109
Issue
12
Pages
2018-2026
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1587067571
Cited by
20
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (078557)
  • Estonian Science Foundation (8847)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
alcohol-related mortality, premature mortality, alcohol biomarkers, alcoholic liver disease, alcohol-related heart disease, underlying cause of death, cause of death classification, alcohol consumption, Estonia
MeSH terms
Adult, Autopsy, Cause of Death, Cross-Sectional Studies, Estonia, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Statistics as Topic, Biomarkers, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Mortality, Premature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review