Cited by 57Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Association between a brief alcohol craving measure and drinking in the following week

Open access
McHugh, R. Kathryn, Fitzmaurice, Garrett M., Griffin, Margaret L., Anton, Raymond F., Weiss, Roger D.·2016·Addiction

Abstract

Background and Aims: Craving for alcohol is thought to be a predictor of alcohol use, particularly in the near future. The assessment of craving in clinical practice requires brief, simple measures that can be implemented routinely. This study tested whether greater alcohol craving was associated with a higher likelihood of alcohol use in the subsequent week. Design: The COMBINE Study (Combining Medications and Behavioral Interventions for Alcohol Dependence) was a large, multi‐site clinical trial of treatment for alcohol dependence. Participants were randomized (stratified by site) to one of nine treatment conditions involving combinations of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy. Craving was assessed every other week throughout the treatment period. Setting: Substance use disorder treatment settings at 11 academic sites across the United States . Participants: Participants from the COMBINE Study ( n = 1370) with available craving data. Measurements: Craving was assessed using the three‐item self‐report Craving Scale. Drinking was assessed using the Timeline Followback method, and was defined as alcohol use in each study week. Findings: There was an average of 5.8 (of a possible seven) observation pairs per participant. Craving was associated strongly with alcohol use in the following week [ B = 0.27, standard error (SE B ) = 0.06, Wald χ 2 = 43.34, odds ratio (OR) = 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.16, 1.47, P < 0.001]. For each 1‐unit increase in the Craving Scale, the likelihood of drinking in the next week was 31% higher. Conclusions: Craving for alcohol is associated strongly with alcohol use in the following week. Clinicians can measure alcohol craving effectively using a brief self‐report craving scale.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.13311

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The craving scale has high internal consistency and validity.

    “The craving scale was initially developed to assess cravings related to cocaine use with high internal consistency and validity [36] and has displayed adequate internal consistency and validity when adapted for other substances [39,40].”

    From Written exposure therapy for treatment of perinatal PTSD among women with comorbid PTSD and SUD: A pilot study examining feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness (2023) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Results (Preliminary Analyses) report excellent concurrent validity for the alcohol-adapted Craving Scale, but internal consistency was poor at baseline (alpha = .46), improved at week 1, and was adequate only at later time points. The source therefore supports the validity claim but not an unqualified claim of high or consistently adequate internal consistency. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McHugh, R. K., Fitzmaurice, G. M., Griffin, M. L., Anton, R. F., & Weiss, R. D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
McHugh, R. Kathryn
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-18
Volume
111
Issue
6
Pages
1004-1010
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2296816441
Cited by
57
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K05AA017435, P50AA010761)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K24DA022288, U10DA015831, K23DA035297)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
alcohol craving, alcohol consumption, alcoholism, alcohol use prediction, COMBINE study, addiction treatment
MeSH terms
Acamprosate, Adult, Alcohol Deterrents, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Naltrexone, Narcotic Antagonists, Taurine, United States, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Odds Ratio, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review