Cited by 378Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Gabapentin misuse, abuse and diversion: A systematic review

Open access
Smith, Rachel V., Havens, Jennifer R., Walsh, Sharon L.·2016·Addiction

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Since its market release, gabapentin has been presumed to have no abuse potential and subsequently has been prescribed widely off-label, despite increasing reports of gabapentin misuse. This review estimates and describes the prevalence and effects of, motivations behind and risk factors for gabapentin misuse, abuse and diversion. METHODS: Databases were searched for peer-reviewed papers demonstrating gabapentin misuse, characterized by taking a larger dosage than prescribed or taking gabapentin without a prescription, and diversion. All types of studies were considered; grey literature was excluded. Thirty-three papers met inclusion criteria, consisting of 23 case studies and 11 epidemiological reports. Published reports came from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Finland, India, South Africa and France, and two analyzed websites not specific to a particular country. RESULTS: Prevalence of gabapentin misuse in the general population was reported to be 1%, 40-65% among individuals with prescriptions and between 15 and 22% within populations of people who abuse opioids. An array of subjective experiences reminiscent of opioids, benzodiazepines and psychedelics were reported over a range of doses, including those within clinical recommendations. Gabapentin was misused primarily for recreational purposes, self-medication or intentional self-harm and was misused alone or in combination with other substances, especially opioids, benzodiazepines and/or alcohol. Individuals with histories of drug abuse were most often involved in its misuse. CONCLUSIONS: Epidemiological and case report evidence suggests that the anti-epileptic and analgesic medication gabapentin is being misused internationally, with substance abuse populations at special risk for misuse/abuse.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.13324

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Neuropathic pain in adults: pharmacological management in non-specialist settings 2013 31961628
  2. [56]Stopforth J Overdose with gabapentin and lamotrigine South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde 1997 87 1388 9472258

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, R. V., Havens, J. R., & Walsh, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science University of Kentucky College of Medicine Lexington KY USA
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Walsh, Sharon L.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-18
Volume
111
Issue
7
Pages
1160-1174
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2273108584
Cited by
378
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA033862)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
gabapentin, drug abuse, drug diversion, off-label drug use, prevalence, recreational drug use, self-medication, intentional self-harm, opioid use, benzodiazepine use, substance use risk factors
MeSH terms
Gabapentin, Amines, Analgesics, Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Humans, Prevalence, Substance-Related Disorders, Prescription Drug Misuse, Prescription Drug Diversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review