Cited by 121Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

A meta-analysis of the efficacy of gabapentin for treating alcohol use disorder

Open access
Kranzler, Henry R., Feinn, Richard, Morris, Paige, Hartwell, Emily E.·2019·Addiction

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Studies of the efficacy of gabapentin for treating alcohol use disorder (AUD) have yielded mixed findings. The aims of our study were to estimate gabapentin's effects on six alcohol-related outcomes, test potential moderators, examine publication bias and evaluate the quality of the studies. METHODS: Meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Using PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov, we selected RCTs of gabapentin's effects on alcohol consumption or a biochemical correlate of it, excluding studies limited to other primary outcomes or that combined gabapentin with other medications. We assessed study quality and used a random-effects model to analyze each outcome measure and the Egger regression test and funnel plots to assess publication bias. RESULTS: We identified seven RCTs of gabapentin that met study criteria. The quality of the studies overall was good, and there was no evidence of publication bias. Four to seven studies contributed to the analysis of the six outcome measures. For all outcome measures the effect estimates were in a direction that favored gabapentin over placebo. However, only for percentage of heavy drinking days was there good evidence of a benefit (g = -0.64, 95% confidence interval = -1.22 to -0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Although gabapentin appears to be more efficacious than placebo in treating AUD, the only measure on which the analysis clearly favors the active medication is percentage of heavy drinking days. Additional studies are needed to define more clearly the role of gabapentin in AUD treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.14655

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In that meta-analysis, results for other outcomes (complete abstinence, relapse to heavy drinking, percent days abstinent, percent heavy drinking days, drinks per day, gamma-glutamyl transferase) were inconclusive.

    “with inconclusive results for other outcomes”
  • In a meta-analysis of seven RCTs, gabapentin showed statistically significant efficacy only in reducing frequency of heavy drinking.

    “In a meta-analysis of seven RCTs assessing outcome measures such as complete abstinence, relapse to heavy drinking, percent days abstinent, percent heavy drinking days, drinks per day, and gamma-glutamyl transferase concentration, gabapentin showed statistically significant efficacy only in reducing the frequency of heavy drinking”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kranzler, H. R., Feinn, R., Morris, P., & Hartwell, E. E.
Affiliations
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
  • Quinnipiac University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Kranzler, Henry R.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-05
Volume
114
Issue
9
Pages
1547-1555
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2944717511
Cited by
121
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01 AA021164, R01 AA023192)
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VISN 4 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
gabapentin, alcoholism, alcohol consumption, heavy drinking days, pharmacotherapy, publication bias, study quality
MeSH terms
Gabapentin, Alcoholism, Humans, Recurrence, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Alcohol Abstinence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review