Cited by 33Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesBehavioral Health and Interventions

Alcohol use in the year following approach bias modification during inpatient withdrawal: secondary outcomes from a double‐blind, multi‐site randomized controlled trial

Open access
Manning, Victoria, Garfield, Joshua B. B., Reynolds, John, Staiger, Petra K., Piercy, Hugh, Bonomo, Yvonne, Lloyd‐Jones, Martyn, Jacka, David +3 more·2022·Addiction

Abstract

Background and aims: Approach bias modification (ApBM) targeting alcohol approach bias has been previously shown to reduce likelihood of relapse during the first 2 weeks following inpatient withdrawal treatment (IWT). We tested whether ApBM’s effects endure for a longer period by analysing alcohol use outcomes 3, 6 and 12 months post‐discharge. Design: A double‐blind, sham‐controlled randomized controlled trial. Setting: Four IWT units in Melbourne, Australia. Participants: Three hundred alcohol IWT patients (173 men, 126 women, 1 non‐binary; mean age 43.5 years) were recruited between 4 June 2017 and 14 July 2019. Follow‐up data collection was completed on 22 September 2020. Intervention and control training: Four ApBM sessions were delivered during IWT. ApBM trained participants (n = 147) to avoid alcohol and approach non‐alcohol beverage cues. Controls (n = 153) responded to the same stimuli, but without approach/avoidance training. Measurements: Date of first lapse was recorded for non‐abstinent participants to determine time to first lapse. Time‐line follow‐back interviews assessed past‐month alcohol consumption at each follow‐up, with participants reporting no alcohol consumption classified as abstinent. In analyses of past‐month abstinence, non‐abstinence was assumed in participants lost to follow‐up. Number of past‐month drinking days, standard drinks and heavy drinking days (five or more standard drinks for women or non‐binary; six or more standard drinks for men) were calculated for non‐abstinent participants at each follow‐up. Findings: ApBM significantly delayed time to first lapse [ApBM median: 53 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 21–61; controls = 12 days, 95% CI = 9–21, P = 0.045]. Past‐month abstinence rates at 3‐, 6‐ and 12‐month follow‐ups were 33/153 (21.6%), 30/153 (19.6%), and 24/153 (15.7%) in controls; and 51/147 (34.7%), 30/147 (20.4%) and 29/147 (19.7%) in the ApBM group, respectively. Past‐month abstinence was significantly more likely in ApBM participants than controls at the 3‐month follow‐up [odds ratio (OR) = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.16–3.23, P = 0.012], but not at 6‐ or 12‐month follow‐ups (6‐month OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.60–1.95, P = 0.862; 12‐month OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.73–2.40, P = 0.360). No significant group differences were found for indices of alcohol consumption in non‐abstinent participants. Conclusions: Approach bias modification for alcohol delivered during inpatient withdrawal treatment helps to prevent relapse, increasing rates of abstinence from alcohol for at least 3 months post‐discharge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.15989

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At least 50% of patients resume excessive heavy drinking within the first month following an inpatient detoxification program.

    “the literature suggests that at least 50% of patients resume excessive heavy drinking within the first month following an inpatient detoxification program [3, 97].”

    From Psilocybin-assisted therapy for severe alcohol use disorder: protocol for a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 7-month parallel-group phase II superiority trial (2024) · cites this paper as [97]

    The Results section (Survival analysis of time to first lapse; page unavailable) reports that 50% of controls had their first drink within 12 days of discharge. But this measures any alcohol use, not excessive heavy drinking; the intervention group's median time to first drink was 53 days. The paper therefore does not establish that at least 50% of patients resume heavy drinking within the first month. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manning, V., Garfield, J. B. B., Reynolds, J., Staiger, P. K., Piercy, H., Bonomo, Y., Lloyd‐Jones, M., Jacka, D., Wiers, R. W., Verdejo‐Garcia, A., & Lubman, D. I.
Affiliations
  • Eastern Health (AU)
  • Alfred Health (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
  • Monash Health (AU)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Turning Point Eastern Health Melbourne Australia
Corresponding author
Manning, Victoria
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-07-13
Volume
117
Issue
11
Pages
2837-2846
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W4283835067
Cited by
33
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
approach bias modification, alcoholism, alcohol withdrawal treatment, relapse prevention, alcohol relapse, abstinence, heavy drinking, long-term follow-up, cue reactivity, cognitive bias modification, medication adherence, standard drinks, heavy drinking days, treatment discontinuation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aftercare, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Patient Discharge, Recurrence, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review