Cited by 582Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers.

Open access
Wiers, Reinout W., Rinck, Mike, Kordts, Robert, Houben, Katrijn, Strack, Fritz·2010·Addiction

Abstract

Aims The main aim of this study was to test whether automatic action‐tendencies to approach alcohol can be modified, and whether this affects drinking behaviour. Design and participants Forty‐two hazardous drinkers were assigned randomly to a condition in which they were implicitly trained to avoid or to approach alcohol, using a training variety of the alcohol Approach Avoidance Test (AAT). Participants pushed or pulled a joystick in response to picture‐format (landscape or portrait). The pictures depicted alcoholic or non‐alcoholic drinks. Participants in the avoid‐alcohol condition pushed most alcoholic and pulled most non‐alcoholic drinks. For participants in the approach‐alcohol condition these contingencies were reversed. After the implicit training, participants performed a taste test, including beers and soft drinks. Automatic action tendencies at post‐test were assessed with the AAT, including both trained and untrained pictures, and with a different test (Implicit Association Test, IAT). We further tested effects on subjective craving. Results Action tendencies for alcohol changed in accordance with training condition, with the largest effects in the clinically relevant avoid‐alcohol condition. These effects occurred outside subjective awareness and generalized to new pictures in the AAT and to an entirely different test using words, rather than pictures (IAT). In relatively heavy drinking participants who demonstrated changed action tendencies in accordance with their training condition, effects were found on drinking behaviour, with participants in the approach‐alcohol condition drinking more alcohol than participants in the avoid‐alcohol condition. No effect was found on subjective craving. Conclusions Retraining automatic processes may help to regain control over addictive impulses, which points to new treatment possibilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02775.x

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Impulsive actions entail selective attentional bias, overattending to what fits the impulsive action in course and neglecting other information.

    “Impulsive actions entail selective attentional bias, overattending to what fits the impulsive action in course, and neglecting other information (e.g., Wiers et al., 2010).”

    From Impulsive action: emotional impulses and their control (2014) · cites this paper as Wiers et al., 2010

    The Introduction says alcohol-related stimuli can automatically capture a problem drinker’s attention and elicit tendencies to approach alcohol. It does not say that impulsive actions generally direct attention toward action-congruent information or cause other information to be neglected. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Schoenmakers T., Lux I., Goertz A., Van Kerkhof D., De Bruin M., Wiers R. W. A randomized clinical trial to measure effects of attentional retraining in alcohol depen- dent patients. Drug Alcohol Depend 2010; in press.
  2. Amir N., Beard C., Burns M., Bomyea J. Attention modi- fication program in individuals with generalized anxiety dis- order. J Abnorm Psychol 2009; 118: 28-33.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiers, R. W., Rinck, M., Kordts, R., Houben, K., & Strack, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Wiers, Reinout W.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-11
Volume
105
Issue
2
Pages
279-287
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2136850887
Cited by
582
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 28
FWCI
22.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universiteit Maastricht
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
approach-avoidance behavior, alcohol, implicit training, Implicit Association Test, alcohol craving, drinking behavior, addiction treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Classical, Cues, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Visual Perception, Behavior, Addictive, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review