Cited by 22Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Motivational interviewing and problem-solving therapy intervention for patients on antiretroviral therapy for HIV in Tshwane, South Africa: A randomized controlled trial to assess the impact on alcohol consumption

Open access
Parry, Charles D. H., Myers, Bronwyn, Londani, Mukhethwa, Shuper, Paul A., Janse van Rensburg, Charl, Manda, Samuel O. M., Nkosi, Sebenzile, Kekwaletswe, Connie T. +4 more·2023·Addiction

Abstract

Background and Aims: Reduction of alcohol consumption is important for people undergoing treatment for HIV. We tested the efficacy of a brief intervention for reducing the average volume of alcohol consumed among patients on HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART). Design, Setting and Participants: This study used a two‐arm multi‐centre randomized controlled trial with follow‐up to 6 months. Recruitment occurred between May 2016 and October 2017 at six ART clinics at public hospitals in Tshwane, South Africa. Participants were people living with HIV, mean age 40.8 years [standard deviation (SD) = 9.07], 57.5% female, and on average 6.9 years (SD = 3.62) on ART. At baseline (BL), the mean number of drinks consumed over the past 30 days was 25.2 (SD = 38.3). Of 756 eligible patients, 623 were enrolled. Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned to a motivational interviewing (MI)/problem‐solving therapy (PST) intervention arm (four modules of MI and PST delivered over two sessions by interventionists) or a treatment as usual (TAU) comparison arm. People assessing outcomes were masked to group assignment. Measurements: The primary outcome was the number of standard drinks (15 ml pure alcohol) consumed during the past 30 days assessed at 6‐month follow‐up (6MFU). Findings: Of the 305 participants randomized to MI/PST, 225 (74%) completed the intervention (all modules). At 6MFU, retention was 88% for the control and 83% for the intervention arm. In support of the hypothesis, an intention‐to‐treat‐analysis for the primary outcome at 6MFU was −0.410 (95% confidence interval = −0.670 to −0.149) units lower on log scale in the intervention group than in the control group (P = 0.002), a 34% relative reduction in the number of drinks. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken for patients who had alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) scores ≥ 8 at BL (n = 299). Findings were similar to those of the whole sample. Conclusions: In South Africa, a motivational interviewing/problem‐solving therapy intervention significantly reduced drinking levels in HIV‐infected patients on antiretroviral therapy at 6‐month follow‐up.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.16278

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interventions in the exploratory search utilized varied strategies including cognitive behavioral therapy, problem solving therapy, motivational interviewing, and advice.

    “interventions utilized varied strategies including cognitive behavioral therapy [32], problem solving therapy [33]MI [25], and advice [34] either offered alone or in combination.”
  • In PLWH in South Africa, the decrease in AUDIT-C score was significantly greater at both time-points in the intervention arm.

    “The decrease in the AUDIT-C score was significantly greater at both time-points in the intervention arm.”
  • In PLWH in South Africa, the brief intervention produced a 34% relative reduction in the number of standard drinks consumed over the past 30 days at 6-month follow-up compared to control (intention-to-treat analysis: −0.410 log units, 95% CI −0.670 to −0.149, P = 0.002).

    “In support of the hypothesis, an intention-to-treat-analysis for the primary outcome at 6-month follow-up was −0.410 (95% confidence interval = −0.670 to −0.149) units lower on log scale in the intervention group than in the control group (P = 0.002), a 34% relative reduction in the number of drinks.”
  • In PLWH in South Africa, participants in the intervention group had lower adjusted log odds of having elevated PEth scores at 3MFU and 6MFU (P < 0.05).

    “Participants in the intervention group also had lower adjustedlog odds of having elevated PEth scores at 3MFU and 6MFU, respectively (P < 0.05).”
  • In PLWH in South Africa, the decrease in total AUDIT scores from baseline to follow-up was significantly greater in the intervention arm than the control arm at both 3MFU and 6MFU (P < 0.05).

    “For total AUDIT scores, the decrease from BL to follow-up for the treatment arm was significantly greater than that of the control arm at both 3MFU and 6MFU (P < 0.05)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parry, C. D. H., Myers, B., Londani, M., Shuper, P. A., Janse van Rensburg, C., Manda, S. O. M., Nkosi, S., Kekwaletswe, C. T., Hahn, J. A., Rehm, J., Sorsdahl, K., & Morojele, N. K.
Affiliations
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • Biostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa and Department of Statistics University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
Parry, Charles D. H.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-06-20
Volume
118
Issue
11
Pages
2164-2176
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W4381325678
Cited by
22
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • South African Medical Research Council ([SAMRC-RFA-IFSP01-2013/AlcoholHIV], RFA-IFSP-01-2013)
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH K24)
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K24AA022586)
  • Fogarty International Center (D43TW012029)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
motivational interviewing, problem-solving therapy, alcohol consumption, HIV, antiretroviral therapy, brief intervention, alcohol consumption reduction, people living with HIV, alcoholism, treatment retention, AUDIT screening, intervention fidelity, South Africa
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Female, Humans, Male, South Africa, HIV Infections, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review