Cited by 49Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Efficacy of the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) for Unhealthy Alcohol Use Among Adults with HIV in Zambia: Results from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Kane, Jeremy C., Sharma, Anjali, Murray, Laura K., Chander, Geetanjali, Kanguya, Tukiya, Skavenski, Stephanie, Chitambi, Chipo, Lasater, Molly E. +8 more·2022·AIDS and Behavior

Abstract

This randomized controlled trial tested the efficacy of a multi-session, evidence-based, lay counselor-delivered transdiagnostic therapy, the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA), in reducing unhealthy alcohol use and comorbidities among persons living with HIV (PLWH) in Zambia. Adult PLWH with (a) unhealthy alcohol use plus mental health or substance use comorbidities, or (b) severe unhealthy alcohol use were randomized to receive a single-session alcohol brief intervention (BI) alone or BI plus referral to CETA. Outcomes were measured at baseline and a 6-month follow-up and included Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score (primary), depression and trauma symptoms, and other substance use (secondary). We enrolled 160 participants; 78 were randomized to BI alone and 82 to BI plus CETA. Due to COVID-19, the trial ended early before 36 participants completed. Statistically and clinically significant reductions in mean AUDIT score from baseline to 6-month follow-up were observed in both groups, however, participants assigned to BI plus CETA had significantly greater reductions compared to BI alone (− 3.2, 95% CI − 6.2 to − 0.1; Cohen’s d : 0.48). The CETA effect size for AUDIT score increased in line with increasing mental health/substance use comorbidity (0 comorbidities d = 0.25; 1–2 comorbidities d = 0.36; 3+ comorbidities d = 1.6). Significant CETA treatment effects were observed for depression, trauma, and several other substances. BI plus referral to CETA was feasible and superior to BI alone for unhealthy alcohol use among adults with HIV, particularly among those with comorbidities. Findings support future effectiveness testing of CETA for HIV outcomes among PLWH with unhealthy alcohol use. Clinical Trials Number: NCT03966885

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10461-021-03408-4

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Single-session brief interventions resulted in reduced alcohol use at 6 months.

    “Concerning alcohol use, single session BI resulted in reduced use at month 1 [50,54]; 6 weeks [72], 3 months [50,61–64], and 6 months [50,52,60,72].”

    From A scoping review of substance use brief interventions in Africa (2024) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Results (page unavailable) indicate that AUDIT scores fell by six months in the BI-alone group, but fell significantly more in the BI-plus-CETA group. Because the trial compared those two groups rather than BI alone with no intervention, it does not establish that the single-session BI itself caused the reduction. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Twelve included psychosocial treatment trials with 2106 participants reported on harmful alcohol use; all reported harmful alcohol use on a continuous scale.

    “Twelve included psychosocial treatment trials with 2106 participants reported on harmful alcohol use. All of these trials reported harmful alcohol use on a continuous scale (Bolton 2014; Jordans 2019; Kane 2022; Madhombiro 2019; Madhombiro 2020; Moraes 2010; Murray 2020; Nadkarni 2017; Nadkarni 2019; Omeje 2018; Schaub 2021; Witte 2011).”
  • Kane et al. additionally included some coping skills training in their BI.

    “Kane et al. [60] additionally included some coping skills training in their BI.”

    From A scoping review of substance use brief interventions in Africa (2024) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Methods > Interventions section (page unavailable) says the BI was adapted from CETA’s Substance Use Reduction element, but does not describe coping-skills training as part of the BI; it directs readers to a separate protocol for the BI components. A search for coping skills in our copy found Cognitive Coping listed as a CETA element, not as a stated component of the BI. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [8]Vinikoor MJ, Sikazwe I, Sharma A, et al. Alcohol use and the HIV care continuum in Zambia: Nationally representative survey. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Boston, 2020 [abstract 1109].
  2. [31]Murray LK Dorsey S Bolton P Building capacity in mental health interventions in low resource countries: an apprenticeship model for training local providers Int J Ment Health Syst. 2011 5 1 30 10.1186/1752-4458-5-30 22099582 PMC3284435 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [39]Kane JC Vinikoor MJ Haroz EE Mental health comorbidity in low-income and middle-income countries: a call for improved measurement and treatment Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 5 11 864 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30301-8 30174288 PMC6644038 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kane, J. C., Sharma, A., Murray, L. K., Chander, G., Kanguya, T., Skavenski, S., Chitambi, C., Lasater, M. E., Paul, R., Cropsey, K., Inoue, S., Bosomprah, S., Danielson, C. K., Chipungu, J., Simenda, F., & Vinikoor, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (ZM)
  • University Teaching Hospital (ZM)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Ministry of Health (ZM)
Corresponding author
Kane, Jeremy C.
Venue
AIDS and Behavior
Published
2021-07-30
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
523-536
ISSN
  • 1090-7165 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3254
OpenAlex
W3184840811
Cited by
49
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 2
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIDS and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R34AA027200, K01AA026523, K24AA027483)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Common Elements Treatment Approach, unhealthy alcohol use, HIV, brief alcohol intervention, transdiagnostic treatment, psychiatric comorbidity, substance use comorbidity, depression, trauma symptoms, auditing, Zambia
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Alcoholism, Humans, Pilot Projects, Zambia, HIV Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review