Cited by 3Comparative Animal Anatomy StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetryForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Preliminary study on cranial measurements and sexual dimorphism in skull bones of gaur (Bos gaurus gaurus, Smith 1827)

Vishwakarma, Ritesh, Sharma, Chandra Prakash, Mondol, Samrat, Habib, Bilal, Bhandari, Bhaskar, Mishra, Rajiv, Gupta, Nitin, Chauhan, Jasbir Singh +1 more·2024·Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia

Abstract

Cranial measurements have been widely used in various studies in wildlife sciences, ranging from understanding predator ecology to wildlife forensics. However, detailed description of morphometry and sexual dimorphism of the skull of gaur Bos gaurus gaurus is lacking. The present study was undertaken to determine the sexual dimorphism based on the cranial measurements of gaur. A total of 12 individual gaur skulls of male (n = 6) and female (n = 6) were studied in the field from the naturally deceased animals between January 2018 and December 2021 in different ranges of Bandhavgarh tiger reserve (BTR), Madhya Pradesh, India. The skull measurements were analysed using univariate and multivariate statistics to determine whether cranial dimensions could be used to differentiate male and female skulls reliably. A total of 43 morphometrical parameters grouped into nine indices were calculated. Select morphometrical parameters viz PL, GFL, AKI, LBB, LFB, GBEE, GBAN, BPOP and GTCH were significantly different (p < 0.05) between sexes, whereas GBAN were significantly higher in female skulls. The measurements demonstrated that the skull of the gaur was dolichocephalic as the profile length and the otion to otion breath in both male and female were <75% of the length. Overall, 28 linear measurements of both the sexes were statistically significant (p < 0.05; <0.01). The calculated indices revealed that the foramen magnum index in the female gaur were significantly higher. In calculated cranial indices the facial index (a) was higher in female and facial index (b) were higher in males. The two important parameters, facial breadth in facial index (a) and the greatest breadth in facial index (b) were positively correlated, though facial index (a) was statistically not significant between the sexes. The greater inner length of the foramen magnum in female skull resulted in foramen being oval whereas it was circular in males. These parameters were decisive for sexual dimorphism, skull comparison and craniological studies. This study ascertained that the frontal index and skull index had no significant influence and were not good indices for discriminating skulls between male and female. Based on the Principal Component Analysis, it was found that skull of male and female gaurs exhibits differences in cranial morphology viz. cranial profile length or total length (PL) and the least inner height of the temporal groove (LIHT). The findings of the present study provide baseline information on various craniometrical measurements of skull of gaur, indices and parameters for sex identification that can be effectively used in understanding sex biased predation ecology, provide base line information to describe variation across its geographic range, and in identifying skulls recovered in wildlife offence cases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ahe.13031

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bartosiewicz L., 1980, Relationships between the cranial measurements of cattle, OSSA, 1980, 3
  2. IBM Corp, 2015, IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 23.0
  3. Joshi H., 2004, Gross anatomical studies of the skull of Indian tiger (Panthera tigris)
  4. Miller M. E., 1964, Anatomy of the dog, 141
  5. Raghavan D., 1964, Anatomy of ox

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vishwakarma, R., Sharma, C. P., Mondol, S., Habib, B., Bhandari, B., Mishra, R., Gupta, N., Chauhan, J. S., & Nigam, P.
Affiliations
  • Wildlife Institute of India (IN)
  • Forest Department Bandhavgarh Tiger Reserve Umaria Madhya Pradesh India
Corresponding author
Nigam, Parag
Venue
Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-03-22
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
e13031-e13031
ISSN
  • 0300-8649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-2096
  • 1439-0264
OpenAlex
W4393118561
Cited by
3
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anatomia Histologia Embryologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
gaur, Bos gaurus, sexual dimorphism, skull morphology, craniometry, cranial index, gender discrimination, dolichocephaly, foramen magnum, wildlife forensics, craniology, principal component analysis, discriminant analysis, linear measurements, facial index
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Wild, Cattle, Cephalometry, Female, Foramen Magnum, Male, Sex Characteristics, Skull

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review