Cited by 16Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementCOVID-19 Impact on ReproductionDiabetes Management and Research

Options for screening for gestational diabetes mellitus during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic

Open access
Simmons, David, Rudland, Victoria L., Wong, Vincent, Flack, Jeff, Mackie, Adam, Ross, Glynis P., Coat, Suzette, Dalal, Raiyomand +2 more·2020·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Abstract

The balance between avoiding severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 contagion and reducing wider clinical risk is unclear for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) testing. Recent recommendations promote diagnostic approaches that limit collection but increase undiagnosed GDM, which potentially increases adverse pregnancy outcome risks. The most sensitive approach to detecting GDM at 24–28 weeks beyond the two‐hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is a one‐hour OGTT (88% sensitivity). Less sensitive approaches use fasting glucose alone (≥5.1 mmol/L: misses 44–54% GDM) or asking ~20% of women for a second visit (fasting glucose 4.7–5.0 mmol/L (62–72% sensitive)). Choices should emphasise local and patient decision‐making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajo.13224

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Simplifying the diagnosis of GDM in order to avoid the risk of COVID-19 infection was associated with the risk of not diagnosing GDM by as much as 20-30%.

    “However, simplifying the diagnosis of GDM in order to avoid the risk of COVID-19 infection was unfortunately associated with the risk of not diagnosing GDM by as much as 20–30%, which may affect obstetric outcomes [63,64,65].”

    From Gestational Diabetes Mellitus—Recent Literature Review (2022) · cites this paper as [64]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simmons, D., Rudland, V. L., Wong, V., Flack, J., Mackie, A., Ross, G. P., Coat, S., Dalal, R., Hague, B. M., & Cheung, N. W.
Affiliations
  • Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals (AU)
  • Westmead Hospital (AU)
  • Liverpool Hospital (AU)
  • Bankstown Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • Women's and Children's Hospital (AU)
  • University of Adelaide and Women’s and Children’s Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia
Corresponding author
Simmons, David
Venue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-10
Volume
60
Issue
5
Pages
660-666
ISSN
  • 0004-8666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-828X
OpenAlex
W3047649906
Cited by
16
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, screening, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, fasting blood glucose, diagnostic sensitivity, missed diagnosis, adverse pregnancy outcomes, patient decision-making, clinical risk
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, COVID-19, Adult, Blood Glucose, Female, Gestational Age, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Patient Isolation, Pneumonia, Viral, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Diagnosis, Diabetes, Gestational, Infection Control, Coronavirus Infections, Risk Assessment, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review